AVID:Featured Media Nominations/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
← Older edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archive navigation|{{Archive number}}}}
{{Archive navigation|{{Archive number}}}}
⚫
{{Archive top|Closing as {{Approved|Passed}} [[File:sig.png|100px|link=User:Hb1290]] '''''[[User talk:Hb1290|Talk]]'''''&nbsp;<b>·</b>&#32;'''''[[Special:Contributions/Hb1290|Edits]]''''' 01:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)}}
==File:Warner-Columbia Filmverleih Gmbh (1972) (From - German trailer of King Boxer from the Arrow Video Shawscope Volume One box set).png==
==File:Warner-Columbia Filmverleih Gmbh (1972) (From - German trailer of King Boxer from the Arrow Video Shawscope Volume One box set).png==
⚫
{{Archive top|Closing as {{Approved|Passed}} [[File:sig.png|100px|link=User:Hb1290]] '''''[[User talk:Hb1290|Talk]]'''''&nbsp;<b>·</b>&#32;'''''[[Special:Contributions/Hb1290|Edits]]''''' 01:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)}}
[[File:Warner-Columbia Filmverleih Gmbh (1972) (From - German trailer of King Boxer from the Arrow Video Shawscope Volume One box set).png|200px|right]]
[[File:Warner-Columbia Filmverleih Gmbh (1972) (From - German trailer of King Boxer from the Arrow Video Shawscope Volume One box set).png|200px|right]]
'''Reason:''' Two things: 1. What's with the impossibly long name? 2. It's only been seen of a German trailer of an obscure movie that no one talks about these days.
'''Reason:''' Two things: 1. What's with the impossibly long name? 2. It's only been seen of a German trailer of an obscure movie that no one talks about these days.

Latest revision as of 09:19, 16 July 2024

← Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 →

File:Warner-Columbia Filmverleih Gmbh (1972) (From - German trailer of King Boxer from the Arrow Video Shawscope Volume One box set).png


The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed Talk · Edits 01:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Two things: 1. What's with the impossibly long name? 2. It's only been seen of a German trailer of an obscure movie that no one talks about these days.

Support

  1. Support (Talk to Me!) 15:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 04:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed Talk · Edits 01:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

20th Century Fox Television (copyright notice, 1984)

Reason: A never before seen or documented variant of this logo. Davidthelogohunter (talk) 11:55, 2 March 2023 (GMT+4)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 17:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support Per Tervor807 (Talk to Me!) 15:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support ZephyrFromAvalon (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing our first video nomination as Passed Talk · Edits 01:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Thames on a synthesizer

Reason: Play the video and you will hear a rare moog synthesizer rendition of the classic "Salute to Thames" fanfare. That and the animation, while not much, is previously unheard of within this community. This variant was seen on Cold Chips. Camenati (talk) 08:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support (Visit my talk page!) 11:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
    Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 20:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support Davidthelogohunter (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2023 (GMT+4)
  4. Support As per above (Talk to Me!) 15:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as  failed Talk · Edits 01:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Columbia tristar 1991.png

Reason: A cheap placeholder for Sony's home media subsidiary.

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose A common logo. Davidthelogohunter (talk) 11:20, 1 March 2023 (GMT+4)
  2. Oppose. I'm sorry, but I do not see what's rare or significant about this. Dominicmgm (talk) 08:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
    Not really common, because it was made as a placeholder for the third logo. And it's significant, because it's Sony. [[File:Sonic-default-dance.gif|50px|link=User:Sonicfan19198282]] (talk) 12:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
    Still need to fix my signature. [[File:Sonic-default-dance.gif|50px|link=User:Sonicfan19198282]] (talk) 12:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
    Fixed my signature. Thanks to Tabit. 21:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Oppose What's so significant about this again? (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
    It's Sony, one of the biggest companies around, yet this certain logo is very rare nowadays. 18:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
  4. Oppose Yeah, it is rare, but it's not THAT significant to be featured here.

Davidthelogohunter (talk) 09:16, 3 March 2023 (GMT+4)

  1. Oppose As per above (Talk to Me!) 15:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed Talk · Edits 01:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Ultra rare National Educational Television logo (1958)

Reason: It is an ultra rare logo that could only be seen on some episodes of The World We Want at https://collections.libraries.indiana.edu/IULMIA/exhibits/show/the-world-we-want/full-episodes-gallery and it is not known to appear in any other series

Support

  1. Support (The Third Place) 16:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 14:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support Россиябол (украина хороша) (talk) 18:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
  4. Support (Talk to Me!) 15:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
  5. Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed Talk · Edits 01:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

National Geographic Video (RARE Russian variant, 1998?)

Reason: There have been a lot of logos that were localised for the Russian language (especially in the Soviet era), but this is probably the least expected logo to have a language variant. Davidthelogohunter (talk) 24 February, 2023 (GMT+4)

Support

  1. Support Cattotld (talk) 16:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 16:56, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support This was definetly a bizarre sight. Didn't expect to find a Russian version of THIS out of all logos. Not sure if my vote counts since I found this though. VPJHuk (talk) 11:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
  4. Support. Again, my jaw dropped at the sight of this. Dominicmgm (talk) 16:34, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
  5. Support Per above (Talk to Me!) 15:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
  6. Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

BBC Enterprises (1990s).png

Reason: This logo was seen on a 1990s reprint of Happy Ever After. Normally, like other discovered BBC Enterprises logo (or any BBC logo for that matter), they usually have a copyright notice or a company name indicator. But strangely, this is just the 1988 BBC logo on a white background, which makes this a more unique find in terms of visuals. Doctorine Dark (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support (Talk to Me!) 20:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 03:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Wdherare.jpg

Reason: The 2000s Disney Home Entertainment logo forgot it was a home entertainment logo.

Support

  1. Support (Talk to Me!) 18:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 22:54, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support · Talk · Edits 23:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose because Disney logos are common. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 17:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
    This one's (most likely) a really rare one. 18:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
    Not all of them are common. · Talk · Edits 03:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Prototype BBC Video logo (1997)

An extremely rare prototype version of the 1997 BBC Video logo! (Talk to Me!) 17:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 06:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support 17:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support No-brainer for a feature. VPJHuk (talk) 13:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Oppose Show the source of this. Davidthelogohunter (talk) 16:47, 15 March 2023 (GMT+4)

He doesn't need a source. All we need to know is that it's rare and it looks different. 17:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

No worries, source has been found, and it was in higher quality than what was in this photo ^^ VPJHuk (talk) 13:06, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose With stuff like prototypes or early logos for companies, a source is very much needed for clarification. I find this kind of stuff all day, and if I don't give a source, people would ask if the find is real or not. So I DEMAND a source for this, because this is sus. Davidthelogohunter (talk) 16:47 17 March 2023 (GMT+4)

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Extremely rare Doordarshan TV ident from its launch in 1959

Reason: It was only recently discovered on a single AP Archives video as shown on its video's description. Also, this is the only Indian TV ident found before the iconic 1976 Doordarshan TV ident as of now. Tanawat2002 (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 18:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support (Talk to Me!) 15:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 18:08, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Solax Studios (1911, 2018) (From - the trailer to Be Natural The Untold Story of Alice Guy-Blaché).png

Reason: One of the few animated logos of the silent era. What makes this unique is that films containing this logo are currently unknown (or possibly completely wiped out from existence), and only made a resurface in a 2018 trailer of Be Natural The Untold Story of Alice Guy-Blaché. Kind of odd. (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 15:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 18:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support Amazing find! AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 21:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support per above (Talk to Me!) 15:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  4. Support What an extremely rare find. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 18:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Sony Pictures (1992).jpeg

Reason: Only seen on a show-off tape from Sony America's Culver City HQ. Also, there's 12 bars here instead of the usual 11. 15:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 19:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support This is a very rare and cool logo! This logo is the earliest known appearance of the Sony bars logo! (Talk to Me!) 15:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  1.  Comment: It's already featured. · Talk · Edits 18:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
    I believe you're mistaking this capture for the 2009 logo, which has a different sequence than this one. When you view this image's information, it's not yet featured. Camenati (talk) 18:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
    Forgot about that, sorry. · Talk · Edits 19:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

The Smash Bros. of the 80s

Reason: Columbia, EMI, Warner? Everyone is here! 15:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 14:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
  1. Support Would be cool if you provided a source.

Davidthelogohunter (talk) 11 March 2023, 12:46 (GMT+4)

Only seen on a few WB, EMI and Columbia movies in the UK. 15:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 18:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support as per above (Talk to Me!) 15:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Well to cut this story short, this is the earliest logo used for Sony Pictures. It's from the 1988 movie, Tiger Warsaw. It might seems like a normal in-credit notice, but it is animated and even has a fanfare. Here is video proof of this rare logo. https://youtu.be/tjkdVk_3n04 Davidthelogohunter (talk) 20:53, 9 March 2023 (GMT+4)

Support

  1. Support Incredible find. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support WOW! (Talk to Me!) 14:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support You have me with the clarification. Camenati (talk) 19:42, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
  4. Support. I might need to see a doctor about my jaw as it's dropping so often from these incredible finds. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
  5. Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
  6. Support My goodness (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 13:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
  7. Support · Talk · Edits 04:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
  8. Support The beginning of a legend- (remembers they were behind the Emoji Movie)- I meant tyrant. 19:43, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Invalid (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Magnetic Video (RARE, 1981)

Reason: Very rare Magnetic Video logo that is currently only known to be seen on a British trailer tape! (Talk to Me!) 18:31, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

Comments

 Comment: These images are already featured. Camenati (talk) 18:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Oops! I didn't know that! (Talk to Me!) 18:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

This is like my first nomination (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Commercial & Industrial Film Division (1959)), through it was used to test image upload and voting system on this wiki. --'''Ashley Taylor''' (My Discord account (Excessive Avarice#1153) got banned from AVID Community Discord for abnormal activities and my soulbond (Cure Finale#1535) got banned too for plasticity reported her freudian slip and correction with dyno.gg log) (talk) 15:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Mondo Media (1998)

Reason: Possibly the original version of this logo in general, while the later version (from 1999 onwards) is common, this version was unnoticed or didn't even have proof that it existed until December of 2022 when it was found on several of shorts for an obscure Canadian series known as Kevin Spencer, which had it's shorts on Mondo before becoming a TV show. TheToonsOfJosh (talk) 04:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support Per AlmightyKingPrawn (Talk to Me!) 15:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support · Talk · Edits 04:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

An unknown logo of a known BBC brand

Reason: The logo for BBC Enterprises, the predecessor to BBC Worldwide, has mostly existed through in-credit versions. However, I believe this capture of the brand's on-screen logo is previously unknown and undocumented. As of this writing, you can't find a very rare logo this obscure and this good of a quality on somewhere like Alexander Street where it is found on Charles and Diana: The First Decade.

Support

  1. Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support Per AlmightyKingPrawn (Talk to Me!) 15:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support Luke2505 (talk) 15:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
  4. Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
  5. Support · Talk · Edits 04:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Universal Worldwide Television (E.T. The 20th Anniversary) (2002)

Reason: this is probably the most complete capture that this logo will ever get, at least for the time being. (link to the vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXp--GXXs4c) Mr. Gann (talk) 02:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support (Talk to Me!) 15:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 04:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Globe in Space

Reason: Do I really need to explain why we must have this featured? Huge credit to 88Rarities for finding this lost gem of a logo. David's Logo Archive (talk) 15:29, April 18th, 2023 (GMT+4)

Support

  1. Support What a rarity! 11:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support Logohub (talk) 11:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support Simply an incredible find, wow. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 13:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
  4. Support Ultra Rare!
  5. Support (Talk to Me!) 13:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
  6. Support · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Walt Disney Home Video (Italy, 1980).jpg

Reason: Rare Italian Walt Disney Home Video logo. (Talk to Me!) 14:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

WGBHFrenchChief.jpeg WGBHFrenchChief-Boston.jpeg WGBHFrenchChief-Presents.jpeg

Reason: Rare black and blue version of the logo only seen on a few episodes of The French Chef. (Talk to Me!) 13:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as  failed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Wdhvtext1984.jpg, Themickeymouseclub.jpg, Walt Disney Home Video ("Coming Soon" variant, 1986).jpg and Walt Disney Home Video (Plain, 2001).jpeg

Reason: These are all just cheap replacements used on certain releases because, quoting this wiki, Disney felt that the 1st logo wouldn’t fit on those releases. 17:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

Support This was always an interesting but also boring logo in my opinion. It's rarity isnt the rarest of the bunch, but.. yeah, I think I can see this on the featured page VPJHuk (talk) 08:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Oppose Not that notable. Davidthelogohunter (talk) April 8th, 2023, 11:13 (GMT+4)

  1. Oppose (Talk to Me!) 13:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Well, what about 20th Century-Fox Video (German, 1982).png? That one became featured, and this is the same as that one. 07:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

There are not many sightings of that TCFV logo. Unlike this one, which has been found multiple times. David's Logo Archive (talk) April 11th, 2023 10:02 (GMT+4)

  1. Oppose per David. · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as  failed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

20th Century Fox Animation (1999).jpeg

Reason: It is only seen at the end of Olive the Other Reindeer. However, it has only resurfaced quite recently.

Support

  1. Support given it only appeared in the VHS release. · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support SonicFan08MZ (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose While a unique logo, this isn't a hard special to find. I actually have it on DVD and I got it for 3 bucks from a thrift store. An obscure logo and relatively obscure cult film, but not rare. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 03:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
    Well, it only appeared at the end of the VHS version. 18:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Oppose per above (Talk to Me!) 07:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
    Didn't you see my comment? SonicFan08MZ (talk) 20:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 Comment: It was only used at the end of the VHS release. SonicFan08MZ (talk) 14:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Warner Bros. International Television Production (2022).jpg

Reason: Usually WB logos don't have copyright stamps on their logos. Not only that, this is on a rather CURRENT logo, so it gives a bit more interest to it. VPJHuk (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 21:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support (Talk to Me!) 03:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support IAmThe789Guy (talk) 20:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose Even with that context in mind, I don't find copyright stamp variants like this one notable, especially with such a small difference compared to the original version. Camenati (talk) 20:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

BBC Video (2000)

Reason: A pretty rare variant for this well-known logo, used only for a promo. https://youtu.be/fUXPoMuBwds for clarification.

Davidthelogohunter (talk) 01:27, 28 March 2023 (GMT+4)

Support

  1. Support VPJHuk (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 21:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support Never seen this before! (Talk to Me!) 03:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

File:MarvelKnightsAnimation1.jpg , File:RareTrailerShoutFactory.jpg, and File:MarvelKnightsAnimation2.jpg

Reason: Check out these rarities! Seems the Marvel Knights logo isn't restricted to just those 2 films. I found these on trailers for Thor & Loki: Blood Brothers. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 01:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Can someone with more source image expertise please fix the files? Idk how to put more than one here. Greatly appreciated. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 01:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

I got you covered. VPJHuk (talk) 06:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 09:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support (Talk to Me!) 17:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as passed. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 01:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

RCA-Columbia Home Video (1988) (Marble Background).png

Reason: Rare variant I found on a promo tape where the logo is on a marble background. Talk · Edits 00:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 03:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support (Talk to Me!) 13:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support Interesting find. I've never seen such a logo before. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 19:07, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as  failed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Magnetic Video Rare UK Version

Reason: Very rare Magnetic Video logo that is only seen on a couple UK tapes! (Talk to Me!) 21:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support It Is Very Notable, I Like Cheesy Logos. User:OwenE (talk) 19:22, 29, March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support 06:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose It's not all that notable imo; it's just simple text. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 21:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
    Oppose on the same basis. (Lets chat!) 06:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Oppose per others. · Talk · Edits 06:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://www.avid.wiki/AVID:Featured_Media_Nominations/Archive_2?oldid=905511"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information