AVID:Featured Media Nominations

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 23:51, 15 May 2023 by Thatvhstapeguy (talk | contribs)

Featured Media Nominations
Shortcut:

Featured media are images and videos determined by the community to be significant, rare or otherwise interesting logo finds. These aren't your ordinary film, television or home video logos. Featured images appear in the gallery on the main page. On this page users can nominate images to be featured and vote on candidates to receive this distinction.

How to use this page:
Click "Nominate", fill out the fields and submit your nomination. Users will then be able to vote in support or opposition to the image being featured. if an image or video recieves at least a support:oppose ratio of 2:1 (two thirds majority), it passes and the proper template is added by a bureaucrat.

We discourage submitting logos solely based on its visuals. All media need to be significant to the community in terms of obscurity.

Etiquette:
Please remain civil while using this page. Per site rules and the policy, please refrain from personal attacks when discussing these images and assume good faith.


Nominate


Reason: Do I need to explain why this logo had to be here? DO I? Here is the original Twitter post to proof that it is real: https://twitter.com/marc_acrylic/status/1658208443419730084

David's Logo Archive (talk) 00:58 May 15th, 2023 (GMT+4)

Support

  1. Support Wow. Another logo mystery solved. Definitely a great featured media candidate. Camenati (talk) 21:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
    Support HOLY. CRAP. We've been on a roll with lost logos as of late. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 21:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support An excellent find. One of the biggest we'll see this year, I think. Luke2505 (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support One of the most notable finds this year, and that's saying something. Thatvhstapeguy (talk) 23:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Greater_Union_Film_Distributors_80s.png

Reason: A logo that has only been conjectured to exist for 7 years, now finally surfaced. Enough said.Thatvhstapeguy (talk) 01:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Support

Support (Talk · Edits) 02:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 04:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk to Me!) 16:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

<

Reason: I don't know much about this one, but it seems to be an earlier logo for Rank (yes, before the famous Gongman). This comes from London Melody. David's Logo Archive (talk) 13:32, May 10th, 2023 (GMT+4)

Support

Support (Talk · Edits) 02:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 04:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk to Me!) 16:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Support Not every day that we learn about something this old. Thatvhstapeguy (talk) 23:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

File:2008-2012ACHSCinemarkChileanPolicyEndcard.jpg

Reason: Thats right, Chile had Front Row Joe intros until 2012! I was able to find 7 of these in total and they will all be uploaded to YouTube in the near future (one of them has already been hiding there for years, and the other ones I will upload are in the depths of Vimeo). All of them end with this. In my hunt for the lost 2012 Cinemark "Dog and Projector" policy I couldn't find it, but I found basically EVERYTHING ELSE, so stay tuned for more Cinemark finds. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 21:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Support

Support · Talk · Edits 04:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk to Me!) 16:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[[:File:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]]

[[File:{{{1}}}|200px|right]] Reason: {{{2}}}

Support

Oppose

Comments

 Comment: Can someone tell me what's wrong here? 15:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

 Comment: Um... Why is this broken?! (Talk to Me!) 16:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Buena Vista International (T.W.D.C.I.S.L. byline) (2021)

Reason: from what i can tell, this doesn't have a standalone capture at all (well, before the last two weeks at least). From the Spanish release of "Competencia oficial". (link to the vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbk8C7KNm84) Mr. Gann (talk) 02:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 19:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support (Talk to Me!) 16:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Embassy Home Entertainment (or video) (idk lmao)

Reason: a pretty rare one from what i can tell. From a German home video trailer for "Shatter". (link to the vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QyULB3REY8 sauce: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9Wx_Xs2v5g) Mr. Gann (talk) 02:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 19:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support (Talk to Me!) 16:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Gaumont (1979)

Reason: a possible placeholder. From "Don Giovanni". (link to the vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QR0HzhqrM0) Mr. Gann (talk) 02:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 19:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
    2. Support Wow! AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 01:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support (Talk to Me!) 16:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Pathé Cinéma (1942)

Reason: this one is a pretty rare/obscure pathé logo from way back. From "À vos ordres, Madame". (link to the vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tgr9WMEdAJc) Mr. Gann (talk) 11:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support Wow! AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 15:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support As the Frenchmen say, interessant. 16:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support · Talk · Edits 18:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
  4. Support (Talk to Me!) 16:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

TCFTV (Dance Fever variant, 1983).jpeg

Reason: Extinct, very interesting logo that was only found on local syndie prints of season 5 of Dance Fever. (Talk to Me!) 14:55, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

Support 15:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose We've known about this for years. Thatvhstapeguy (talk) 23:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Buena Vista International Korea.jpeg

Reason: It was only seen on 2 movies, Phone and Bunshinsaba, both of which are very obscure movies. 15:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support (Talk to Me!) 14:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 18:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Ua1987prototype.png

Reason: Rare United Artists logo only seen on early UK theatrical prints and current prints of The Living Daylights. (Talk to Me!) 08:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose This logo appeared on newer prints and home media releases of said film, so its rarity has lost its value. Camenati (talk) 08:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Oppose per Camenati. 15:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  3. Oppose. As has been said before, a logo only appearing on one work only qualifies it as rare if the work in question is hard to find. The Living Daylights, I can easily find a brand new copy of, and it's most likely gonna have the logo. Dominicmgm (talk) 19:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

8FFFC9FF-660F-47C6-98B3-1C3782CF2A22.jpeg

Reason: Ultra rare Warner Premier logo only found on one DVD release. (Talk to Me!) 08:09, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose I don't think it's notable, especially when the logo looks really similar to the final product of the company's next logo. Camenati (talk) 08:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Oppose Not unique enough from the more common version. Unique, yes. Notable -- not really. Thatvhstapeguy (talk) 23:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Disney Videos (rare filmed variant, 1995)

Reason: Home video logos on old TV airings is a thing, but what isn't really normal is this example. A very interesting example of a home video logo on film. David's Logo Archive (talk) April 19th, 2023 12:24 (GMT+4)

Support

  1. Support (Talk to Me!) 13:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments


The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Globe in Space

Reason: Do I really need to explain why we must have this featured? Huge credit to 88Rarities for finding this lost gem of a logo. David's Logo Archive (talk) 15:29, April 18th, 2023 (GMT+4)

Support

  1. Support What a rarity! 11:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support Logohub (talk) 11:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support Simply an incredible find, wow. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 13:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
  4. Support Ultra Rare!
  5. Support (Talk to Me!) 13:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
  6. Support · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Walt Disney Home Video (Italy, 1980).jpg

Reason: Rare Italian Walt Disney Home Video logo. (Talk to Me!) 14:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

WGBHFrenchChief.jpeg WGBHFrenchChief-Boston.jpeg WGBHFrenchChief-Presents.jpeg

Reason: Rare black and blue version of the logo only seen on a few episodes of The French Chef. (Talk to Me!) 13:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as  failed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Wdhvtext1984.jpg, Themickeymouseclub.jpg, Walt Disney Home Video ("Coming Soon" variant, 1986).jpg and Walt Disney Home Video (Plain, 2001).jpeg

Reason: These are all just cheap replacements used on certain releases because, quoting this wiki, Disney felt that the 1st logo wouldn’t fit on those releases. 17:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

Support This was always an interesting but also boring logo in my opinion. It's rarity isnt the rarest of the bunch, but.. yeah, I think I can see this on the featured page VPJHuk (talk) 08:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Oppose Not that notable. Davidthelogohunter (talk) April 8th, 2023, 11:13 (GMT+4)

  1. Oppose (Talk to Me!) 13:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Well, what about 20th Century-Fox Video (German, 1982).png? That one became featured, and this is the same as that one. 07:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

There are not many sightings of that TCFV logo. Unlike this one, which has been found multiple times. David's Logo Archive (talk) April 11th, 2023 10:02 (GMT+4)

  1. Oppose per David. · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as  failed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

20th Century Fox Animation (1999).jpeg

Reason: It is only seen at the end of Olive the Other Reindeer. However, it has only resurfaced quite recently.

Support

  1. Support given it only appeared in the VHS release. · Talk · Edits 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support SonicFan08MZ (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose While a unique logo, this isn't a hard special to find. I actually have it on DVD and I got it for 3 bucks from a thrift store. An obscure logo and relatively obscure cult film, but not rare. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 03:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
    Well, it only appeared at the end of the VHS version. 18:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Oppose per above (Talk to Me!) 07:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
    Didn't you see my comment? SonicFan08MZ (talk) 20:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 Comment: It was only used at the end of the VHS release. SonicFan08MZ (talk) 14:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Warner Bros. International Television Production (2022).jpg

Reason: Usually WB logos don't have copyright stamps on their logos. Not only that, this is on a rather CURRENT logo, so it gives a bit more interest to it. VPJHuk (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 21:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support (Talk to Me!) 03:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support IAmThe789Guy (talk) 20:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose Even with that context in mind, I don't find copyright stamp variants like this one notable, especially with such a small difference compared to the original version. Camenati (talk) 20:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

BBC Video (2000)

Reason: A pretty rare variant for this well-known logo, used only for a promo. https://youtu.be/fUXPoMuBwds for clarification.

Davidthelogohunter (talk) 01:27, 28 March 2023 (GMT+4)

Support

  1. Support VPJHuk (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support · Talk · Edits 21:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support Never seen this before! (Talk to Me!) 03:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as Passed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

File:MarvelKnightsAnimation1.jpg , File:RareTrailerShoutFactory.jpg, and File:MarvelKnightsAnimation2.jpg

Reason: Check out these rarities! Seems the Marvel Knights logo isn't restricted to just those 2 films. I found these on trailers for Thor & Loki: Blood Brothers. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 01:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Can someone with more source image expertise please fix the files? Idk how to put more than one here. Greatly appreciated. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 01:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

I got you covered. VPJHuk (talk) 06:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 09:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support (Talk to Me!) 17:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as passed. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 01:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

RCA-Columbia Home Video (1988) (Marble Background).png

Reason: Rare variant I found on a promo tape where the logo is on a marble background. Talk · Edits 00:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support · Talk · Edits 03:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support (Talk to Me!) 13:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Support Interesting find. I've never seen such a logo before. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 19:07, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.



The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as  failed (Talk · Edits) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Magnetic Video Rare UK Version

Reason: Very rare Magnetic Video logo that is only seen on a couple UK tapes! (Talk to Me!) 21:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support It Is Very Notable, I Like Cheesy Logos. User:OwenE (talk) 19:22, 29, March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Support 06:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose It's not all that notable imo; it's just simple text. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 21:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
    Oppose on the same basis. (Lets chat!) 06:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Oppose per others. · Talk · Edits 06:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://www.avid.wiki/AVID:Featured_Media_Nominations?oldid=474268"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information