AVID:Requests for Comment/AVID X TLW UK: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
||
# Scope issue aside, "An AVID Company" is not appropriate for a partnership with an otherwise unknown/unaffiliated youtube channel. Only to be considered if it is actually an avid property. I don't see what the communities really have to offer each other but if someone wants to reach out to them and have a chat (preferably, reach out from staff), maybe something interesting could happen. --'''[[User:Raidarr|raidarr]]''' '''('''[[User_talk:Raidarr|💬]]''')''' 12:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:04, 6 August 2024
 | This proposal was submitted for staff review. If a week has passed and this proposal is still not reviewed, please notify site staff. Please do not vote on the RFC yet. If one or two staff members abstain or decline the draft, the publisher can continue working on it to address the issues raised. To add reasoning, use the following parameters "staffreason1" or "staffreason2" Staff member 1: Staff member 2: Last edited by Raidarr (talk | contribs) 2 months ago. (Update) |
AVID X The Logo World UK
A Popular youtube channel just relaunched, and is starting afresh. By teaming up with him, We can Allow content he finds to enter the site, and his intro will get a "A AVID Company" Byline. Also, ECPs, In Program pointers, and Breakdown slides will come here.
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
- Scope issue aside, "An AVID Company" is not appropriate for a partnership with an otherwise unknown/unaffiliated youtube channel. Only to be considered if it is actually an avid property. I don't see what the communities really have to offer each other but if someone wants to reach out to them and have a chat (preferably, reach out from staff), maybe something interesting could happen. --raidarr (💬) 12:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
