AVID:Requests for Comment/AVID X TLW UK: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Raidarr (talk | contribs)
Camenati (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archive top|Closing as {{rejected|failed}} after draft rejection and no revisions after a few weeks. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 04:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)}}
{{RFC Draft
{{RFC Draft
|submit=Yes
|submit=Yes
Line 15: Line 16:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
# Scope issue aside, "An AVID Company" is not appropriate for a partnership with an otherwise unknown/unaffiliated youtube channel. Only to be considered if it is actually an avid property. I don't see what the communities really have to offer each other but if someone wants to reach out to them and have a chat (preferably, reach out from staff), maybe something interesting could happen. --'''[[User:Raidarr|raidarr]]''' '''('''[[User_talk:Raidarr|💬]]''')''' 12:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
# Scope issue aside, "An AVID Company" is not appropriate for a partnership with an otherwise unknown/unaffiliated youtube channel. Only to be considered if it is actually an avid property. I don't see what the communities really have to offer each other but if someone wants to reach out to them and have a chat (preferably, reach out from staff), maybe something interesting could happen. --'''[[User:Raidarr|raidarr]]''' '''('''[[User_talk:Raidarr|💬]]''')''' 12:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
{{Archive bottom}}

Revision as of 04:41, 3 September 2024


Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.