AVID:Requests for Comment/AVID logo refresh: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive top|Closing under SNOW as '''passed''' per overwhelming supportive consensus. [[User:HibiscusCrown20|HibiscusCrown20]] ([[User talk:HibiscusCrown20|talk]]) 01:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
==AVID logo refresh== |
==AVID logo refresh== |
||
As I'm sure some of you are aware, there are multiple variants of the AVID logomark out there. I propose we finally standardise this. |
As I'm sure some of you are aware, there are multiple variants of the AVID logomark out there. I propose we finally standardise this. |
||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
#{{Support}} As Proposer seeing as that RFC failed. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 23:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} As Proposer seeing as that RFC failed. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 23:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Support}} [[User:NancerAVID|NancerAVID]] ([[User talk:NancerAVID|talk]]) 11:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} [[User:NancerAVID|NancerAVID]] ([[User talk:NancerAVID|talk]]) 11:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Support}} as making sense for consistency. May as well bring it to 10 and let this proceed expediently. --[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 01:37, 26 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
<s>{{Abstain}} I don't mind the refined logos, but there's nothing wrong with the current logo. [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 05:08, 22 March 2023 (UTC)</s> |
<s>{{Abstain}} I don't mind the refined logos, but there's nothing wrong with the current logo. [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 05:08, 22 March 2023 (UTC)</s> |
||
| Line 34: | Line 37: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
{{Archive bottom}} |
|||
[[Category:Closed Requests for Comment]] |
|||
[[Category:Passed Requests for Comment]] |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
||
Latest revision as of 01:39, 26 March 2023
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Closing under SNOW as passed per overwhelming supportive consensus. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 01:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
AVID logo refresh
As I'm sure some of you are aware, there are multiple variants of the AVID logomark out there. I propose we finally standardise this.
There are 3 known variants out there.
- A super bold variant used in the favicon.
- The main logo version, shown here.
- A refined version, by Nancer, used for AVIDCAST and on the Discord server banner, shown here.
Due to the design on the logo, only the refined version can be used for a typeface based on the logo, as otherwise the lines would be too thick for certain letterforms. I propose we officially switch all usage of the AVID logo to this refined version. 
(Lets chat!) 03:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support so long as the logo retains the current gradient (maybe with purple added). 
· Talk · Edits 03:54, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Case in point. · Talk · Edits 05:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Case in point.
- Support the refined version with the purple added. Logohub (talk) 04:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support no offense to Kris, of course LurkingManiac (talk) 04:15, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support Ashley Taylor ft. Cure Finale (soulbond) and Raboot (pet) (talk) 10:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support Per everyone. Compooper (talk) 12:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Originally oppose but changed my mind after reading everyone's comments. Support once and for all. PokeRapMonster (talk) 11:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support as I changed my mind now!
(Talk to Me!) 11:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC) - Support As Proposer seeing as that RFC failed. (Lets chat!) 23:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support NancerAVID (talk) 11:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support as making sense for consistency. May as well bring it to 10 and let this proceed expediently. --Raidarr (talk) 01:37, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Abstain I don't mind the refined logos, but there's nothing wrong with the current logo. 
(Talk to Me!) 05:08, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is so it can look better at smaller sizes, as well as make the logo's thickness more consistent between the favicon, the site logo, and the Discord banner, and so a typeface based on the AVID logo could be made. · Talk · Edits 05:10, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- It's just my opinion. (Talk to Me!) 06:31, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- yeah that's cool, just made sense to point out that you've missed the most important part of the proposal: standardisation. We've got 3 different AVID logos all flying around, and the idea of this proposal to actually tie everything together under a unified brand. (Lets chat!) 11:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- yeah that's cool, just made sense to point out that you've missed the most important part of the proposal: standardisation. We've got 3 different AVID logos all flying around, and the idea of this proposal to actually tie everything together under a unified brand.
- It's just my opinion.
Oppose
Oppose Whatever the current version of the AVID logo is, it's just fine. There's no need to change it. PokeRapMonster (talk) 10:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
