AVID:Requests for Comment/Abolish the rule "No Stealing Content": Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
imported>Blad Created page with "First, this rule is way too difficult to enforce on a practical level. Quoting myself from here, "This wiki is licensed by CC BY-SA. With proper attribution I don't see how cloning is a problem. Don't like clones? Change the license. Plus, clones on Miraheze wikis would automatically be forbidden by the current content policy. Hell, even if a clone was hosted on another site, I'd doubt that the copycat(s) would comply and remove..." |
m Copying from Category:Requests for Comment to Category:Failed Requests for Comment using Cat-a-lot |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
Withdrawn. I was unaware of a similar RfC going on. [[User:Blad|Blad]] ([[User talk:Blad|talk]]) 19:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
First, this rule is way too difficult to enforce on a practical level. Quoting myself from [[AVID:Requests_for_Comment/Rules_reform|here]], "This wiki is licensed by CC BY-SA. With proper attribution I don't see how cloning is a problem. Don't like clones? Change the license. Plus, clones on Miraheze wikis would automatically be forbidden by the current content policy. Hell, even if a clone was hosted on another site, I'd doubt that the copycat(s) would comply and remove said content." |
First, this rule is way too difficult to enforce on a practical level. Quoting myself from [[AVID:Requests_for_Comment/Rules_reform|here]], "This wiki is licensed by CC BY-SA. With proper attribution I don't see how cloning is a problem. Don't like clones? Change the license. Plus, clones on Miraheze wikis would automatically be forbidden by the current content policy. Hell, even if a clone was hosted on another site, I'd doubt that the copycat(s) would comply and remove said content." |
||
Second, this rule massively blew up in the [[AVID:Requests_for_Comment/Rules_reform|aformentioned RfC we just had.]] Many issues brought up revolved around the rule itself, not necessarily the change. For these reasons I think it should be removed. [[User:Blad|Blad]] ([[User talk:Blad|talk]]) 19:53, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
Second, this rule massively blew up in the [[AVID:Requests_for_Comment/Rules_reform|aformentioned RfC we just had.]] Many issues brought up revolved around the rule itself, not necessarily the change. For these reasons I think it should be removed. [[User:Blad|Blad]] ([[User talk:Blad|talk]]) 19:53, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
==Discussion== |
==Discussion== |
||
* Just reminding you this: there is already a [[AVID:Requests for Comment/Rules reform - Remove the "No Stealing Content" rule.|proposal]] for this. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 19:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
[[Category:Failed Requests for Comment]] |
|||
</div> |
|||
