(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1:
Line 1:
{{Archive top|Closing as '''no consensus'''. [[User:HibiscusCrown20|HibiscusCrown20]] ([[User talk:HibiscusCrown20|talk]]) 17:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)}}
==Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut==
==Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut==
So yeah, I have seen that Logopedia puts "(tentative)" for logos that are yet to make their official debut; see example [https://logos.fandom.com/wiki/Pepsi here]. Well I was planning this should also be done on AVID. How does that sound?
So yeah, I have seen that Logopedia puts "(tentative)" for logos that are yet to make their official debut; see example [https://logos.fandom.com/wiki/Pepsi here]. Well I was planning this should also be done on AVID. How does that sound?
Line 24:
Line 25:
===Comments===
===Comments===
{{Archive bottom}}
[[Category:Closed Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Failed Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
Latest revision as of 17:00, 5 May 2023
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
So yeah, I have seen that Logopedia puts "(tentative)" for logos that are yet to make their official debut; see example here. Well I was planning this should also be done on AVID. How does that sound?
PS: For examples, you can look at my sandbox here.
11:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support Can do, I guess. Gilby1385 (talk) 18:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Abstain I think we should aim to not be too similar to Logopedia personally. Some implementations, such as ImageTOC and Chronology have proven useful, but I fear that pushing for further similarities would lead to a bad reputation for us amongst LP users. (Lets chat!) 11:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Good point. Gilby1385 (talk) 20:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Abstain per EMG. ·Talk·Edits 23:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I'm going to be perfectly real here, how would we even implement this? If a logo debuts on-screen, the date of when that happens should be the first release date for the logo, we shouldn't need a "tentative". This would really only work for print logos on Logopedia and I feel like this won't translate well into AVID's focus of animated, on-screen logos. Compooper (talk) 23:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
precisely. This would only work in fringe cases where the logo is revealed before its first usage (Disney100, for example). We shouldn't implement something that would be used on 1 in every 500 pages at best. (Lets chat!) 01:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
11:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Abstain I think we should aim to not be too similar to Logopedia personally. Some implementations, such as ImageTOC and Chronology have proven useful, but I fear that pushing for further similarities would lead to a bad reputation for us amongst LP users. 
(Lets chat!) 11:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
· Talk · Edits 23:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I'm going to be perfectly real here, how would we even implement this? If a logo debuts on-screen, the date of when that happens should be the first release date for the logo, we shouldn't need a "tentative". This would really only work for print logos on Logopedia and I feel like this won't translate well into AVID's focus of animated, on-screen logos. Compooper (talk) 23:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
19:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
