AVID:Requests for Comment/Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
→Oppose: Reply |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
#{{Oppose}} I'm going to be perfectly real here, how would we even implement this? If a logo debuts on-screen, the date of when that happens should be the first release date for the logo, we shouldn't need a "tentative". This would really only work for print logos on Logopedia and I feel like this won't translate well into AVID's focus of animated, on-screen logos. [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 23:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} I'm going to be perfectly real here, how would we even implement this? If a logo debuts on-screen, the date of when that happens should be the first release date for the logo, we shouldn't need a "tentative". This would really only work for print logos on Logopedia and I feel like this won't translate well into AVID's focus of animated, on-screen logos. [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 23:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC) |
||
#:precisely. This would only work in ''fringe'' cases where the logo is revealed before its first usage (Disney100). We shouldn't implement something that would be used on 1 in every 500 pages at best. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 01:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
Revision as of 01:58, 28 April 2023
Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut
So yeah, I have seen that Logopedia puts "(tentative)" for logos that are yet to make their official debut; see example here. Well I was planning this should also be done on AVID. How does that sound?
PS: For examples, you can look at my sandbox here.
Support
Abstain
- Abstain I think we should aim to not be too similar to Logopedia personally. Some implementations, such as ImageTOC and Chronology have proven useful, but I fear that pushing for further similarities would lead to a bad reputation for us amongst LP users. (Lets chat!) 11:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Abstain per EMG. · Talk · Edits 23:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Abstain Per everyone ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose I'm going to be perfectly real here, how would we even implement this? If a logo debuts on-screen, the date of when that happens should be the first release date for the logo, we shouldn't need a "tentative". This would really only work for print logos on Logopedia and I feel like this won't translate well into AVID's focus of animated, on-screen logos. Compooper (talk) 23:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- precisely. This would only work in fringe cases where the logo is revealed before its first usage (Disney100). We shouldn't implement something that would be used on 1 in every 500 pages at best. (Lets chat!) 01:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)