AVID:Requests for Comment/Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 13:
#{{Abstain}} per EMG. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 23:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
#:Same. [[User:MJ2003|MJ2003]] ([[User talk:MJ2003|talk]]) 23:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
#{{Abstain}} Per everyone [[User:ForcedExcess26|ForcedExcess26]] ([[User talk:ForcedExcess26|talk]]) 23:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
===Oppose===
|
Revision as of 23:50, 27 April 2023
Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut
So yeah, I have seen that Logopedia puts "(tentative)" for logos that are yet to make their official debut; see example here. Well I was planning this should also be done on AVID. How does that sound?
PS: For examples, you can look at my sandbox here.
Support
Abstain
- Abstain I think we should aim to not be too similar to Logopedia personally. Some implementations, such as ImageTOC and Chronology have proven useful, but I fear that pushing for further similarities would lead to a bad reputation for us amongst LP users. (Lets chat!) 11:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Abstain per EMG. · Talk · Edits 23:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Abstain Per everyone ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose I'm going to be perfectly real here, how would we even implement this? If a logo debuts on-screen, the date of when that happens should be the first release date for the logo, we shouldn't need a "tentative". This would really only work for print logos on Logopedia and I feel like this won't translate well into AVID's focus of animated, on-screen logos. Compooper (talk) 23:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)