AVID:Requests for Comment/Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "{{subst:RfC Page|Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut|So yeah, I have seen that Logopedia puts "(tentative)" for logos that are yet to make their official debut; see example [https://logos.fandom.com/wiki/Pepsi here]. Well I was planning this should also be done on AVID. How does that sound? PS: For examples, you can look at my sandbox here. ~~~~ }}" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
#{{Abstain}} I think we should aim to not be too similar to Logopedia personally. Some implementations, such as ImageTOC and Chronology have proven useful, but I fear that pushing for further similarities would lead to a bad reputation for us amongst LP users. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 11:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
Revision as of 11:42, 27 April 2023
Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut
So yeah, I have seen that Logopedia puts "(tentative)" for logos that are yet to make their official debut; see example here. Well I was planning this should also be done on AVID. How does that sound?
PS: For examples, you can look at my sandbox here.
11:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Abstain I think we should aim to not be too similar to Logopedia personally. Some implementations, such as ImageTOC and Chronology have proven useful, but I fear that pushing for further similarities would lead to a bad reputation for us amongst LP users. 
(Lets chat!) 11:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
