AVID:Requests for Comment/Add "Investigation Needed" as an Availability tier

The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closed for proposal 2 as Passed Compooper (talk) 16:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

---

I have been testing this on the Clip-On libraries to tell that more captures are needed in order to determine where it falls in the Availability scale. (Talk!) 23:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposal 1: Add it as a tier

Support

• Support yes, when I wrote the PopCap Games page I did not investigate enough ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

* Support (The Third Place) 20:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

• Support Great idea! (Talk to Me!) 09:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
• Support I guess it could work. Gilby1385 (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Abstain

#  Abstain, both sides are making good points (The Third Place) 23:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

1. the oppose side hasn't even replied yet ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

   I think he's just trying to hedge his bets either way. Solarstrike (talk) 20:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose as a standalone tier. I don’t think it needs to be an Availability tier, I think it should be stated after a standard Availability tier, e.g. "Rare, but it may need more investigation to confirm." (Lets chat!) 23:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

   What's wrong with it as a tier? (Talk to Me!) 19:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

2. Oppose for similar reasons as EMG. Solarstrike (talk) 20:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
3. Oppose Seems redundant as a standalone tier. Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposal 2: Make this a template

Support

Support After rethinking, this would be better. (Talk!) 23:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Support · Talk · Edits 23:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Support as I feel this idea would work far better. It communicates that we are not 100% confident with our understanding of the logo, whilst also showing what we know so far. (Lets chat!) 01:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Support for this incarnation. Solarstrike (talk) 02:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Support (The Third Place) 12:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Support A template can easily be more noticeable than a tier in one section. VPJHuk (talk) 16:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 17:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Support Luke2505 (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Support. This idea works far better as a template. Dominicmgm (talk) 10:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Support I highly hereby ratify this proposal as a whole. This will help co-ordinate with my RfC too. ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 12:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Abstain

 Abstain I think it's a better idea as a tier. (Talk to Me!) 09:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

How so? · Talk · Edits 21:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments

•  Comment: Potential SNOW closure for Proposal 2. (Talk!) 13:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.