AVID:Requests for Comment/Add "Investigation Needed" as an Availability tier: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive top|Closed for proposal 2 as {{Approved|Passed}} [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 16:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
I have been testing this on the Clip-On libraries to tell that more captures are needed in order to determine where it falls in the Availability scale. [[File:JrStudios Logo .png|150px|link=User:JrStudios]]([[User talk:JrStudios|Talk!]]) 23:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
I have been testing this on the Clip-On libraries to tell that more captures are needed in order to determine where it falls in the Availability scale. [[File:JrStudios Logo .png|150px|link=User:JrStudios]]([[User talk:JrStudios|Talk!]]) 23:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
==Proposal 1: Add it as a tier== |
==Proposal 1: Add it as a tier== |
||
Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
<s>*{{Support}} [[File:NLiteChannel.jpg|75px|link=User:N-Lite]] ([[User talk:N-Lite|The Third Place]]) 20:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)</s> |
<s>*{{Support}} [[File:NLiteChannel.jpg|75px|link=User:N-Lite]] ([[User talk:N-Lite|The Third Place]]) 20:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)</s> |
||
*{{Support}} Great idea! [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 09:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC) |
*{{Support}} Great idea! [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 09:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
*{{Support}} I guess it could work. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 20:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
#{{Oppose}} '''as a standalone tier'''. I don’t think it needs to be an Availability tier, I think it should be stated after a standard Availability tier, e.g. "Rare, but it may need more investigation to confirm." [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 23:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} '''as a standalone tier'''. I don’t think it needs to be an Availability tier, I think it should be stated after a standard Availability tier, e.g. "Rare, but it may need more investigation to confirm." [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 23:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
#:What's wrong with it as a tier? [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 19:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Oppose}} for similar reasons as EMG. [[User:Solarstrike|Solarstrike]] ([[User talk:Solarstrike|talk]]) 20:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} for similar reasons as EMG. [[User:Solarstrike|Solarstrike]] ([[User talk:Solarstrike|talk]]) 20:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Oppose}} Seems redundant as a standalone tier. <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 12:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} Seems redundant as a standalone tier. <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 12:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
Line 51: | Line 54: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
* {{Comment}} Potential SNOW closure for Proposal 2. |
* {{Comment}} Potential SNOW closure for Proposal 2. [[File:JrStudios Logo .png|150px|link=User:JrStudios]]([[User talk:JrStudios|Talk!]]) 13:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
{{Archive bottom}} |
Latest revision as of 16:45, 12 February 2023