AVID:Requests for Comment/Add "Investigation Needed" as an Availability tier: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
→Abstain: Reply |
|||
Line 6:
===Abstain===
# {{Abstain}}, both sides are making good points [[File:NLiteChannel.jpg|75px|link=User:N-Lite]] ([[User talk:N-Lite|The Third Place]]) 23:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
#:the oppose side hasn't replied yet [[User:ForcedExcess26|ForcedExcess26]] ([[User talk:ForcedExcess26|talk]]) 23:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
===Oppose===
|
Revision as of 23:49, 3 February 2023
I have been testing this on the Clip-On libraries to tell that more captures are needed in order to determine where it falls in the Availability scale. (Talk!) 23:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
- Support yes, when I wrote the PopCap Games page I did not investigate enough ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
- Abstain, both sides are making good points (The Third Place) 23:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- the oppose side hasn't replied yet ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)