AVID:Requests for Comment/Add "Investigation Needed" as an Availability tier: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 9:
===Oppose===
#{{Oppose}} ''as a standalone tier''. I don’t think it needs to be an Availability tier, I think it should be stated after a standard Availability tier, e.g. "Rare, but it may need more investigation to confirm." [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 23:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
===Comments===
| |||
Revision as of 23:56, 3 February 2023
I have been testing this on the Clip-On libraries to tell that more captures are needed in order to determine where it falls in the Availability scale. 
(Talk!) 23:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support yes, when I wrote the PopCap Games page I did not investigate enough ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Abstain, both sides are making good points 
(The Third Place) 23:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- the oppose side hasn't even replied yet ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose as a standalone tier. I don’t think it needs to be an Availability tier, I think it should be stated after a standard Availability tier, e.g. "Rare, but it may need more investigation to confirm." 
(Lets chat!) 23:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
