AVID:Requests for Comment/Add 'Music/Sounds' to logo variants: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "{{subst:RfC Page|Add 'Music/Sounds' to logo variants|Should we add the 'Music/Sounds' section to the logo variants pages? This will only apply to logo variants that have their own custom music/fanfare and not ones that are silent or use the opening theme of the movie. One example will be the Blazing Saddles variant of the Warner Bros. Pictures logo which could state: 'A sped-up, re-orchestrated version of the 1937 Max Steiner fanfare that surges into the opening theme of..." |
imported>IAmThe789Guy No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
#{{Oppose}} They're fine the way they are. Adding that will (probably) result in page clutter. [[User:IAmThe789Guy|IAmThe789Guy]] ([[User talk:IAmThe789Guy|talk]]) 14:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
Revision as of 14:31, 2 April 2023
Add 'Music/Sounds' to logo variants
Should we add the 'Music/Sounds' section to the logo variants pages? This will only apply to logo variants that have their own custom music/fanfare and not ones that are silent or use the opening theme of the movie. One example will be the Blazing Saddles variant of the Warner Bros. Pictures logo which could state: 'A sped-up, re-orchestrated version of the 1937 Max Steiner fanfare that surges into the opening theme of the movie when the logo is on fire.' if this succeeds. 
(Talk to Me!) 14:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose They're fine the way they are. Adding that will (probably) result in page clutter. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 14:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
