AVID:Requests for Comment/Add April Fools joke: Difference between revisions
do not reply on closed rfcs please |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive top|Speedy closing as '''invalid''', trivial matters like this should be discussed on the forums. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 08:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
Ah... Since Logopedia has had April Fools jokes every year, why not do it the same for AVID? I suggest the April Fools joke for 2023 is that all mentions of "AVID" on the main page and the header are replaced back with "CLG Wiki" cuz a lot miss the CLG Wiki era. [[User:PokeRapMonster|PokeRapMonster]] ([[User talk:PokeRapMonster|talk]]) 07:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) |
Ah... Since Logopedia has had April Fools jokes every year, why not do it the same for AVID? I suggest the April Fools joke for 2023 is that all mentions of "AVID" on the main page and the header are replaced back with "CLG Wiki" cuz a lot miss the CLG Wiki era. [[User:PokeRapMonster|PokeRapMonster]] ([[User talk:PokeRapMonster|talk]]) 07:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
I do agree with the idea, but I'm not sure this is the right use for RfCs. They're not for trivial matters like this. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 08:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
{{Archive bottom}} |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
Latest revision as of 08:16, 12 January 2023
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Ah... Since Logopedia has had April Fools jokes every year, why not do it the same for AVID? I suggest the April Fools joke for 2023 is that all mentions of "AVID" on the main page and the header are replaced back with "CLG Wiki" cuz a lot miss the CLG Wiki era. PokeRapMonster (talk) 07:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support Sounds cool! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 07:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
I do agree with the idea, but I'm not sure this is the right use for RfCs. They're not for trivial matters like this. 
· Talk · Edits 08:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
