AVID:Requests for Comment/Add a time limit to featured image proposals: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
# {{Support}} That is fair. I don't see why some nominations in that page last up to a month when by that time, everyone has forgotten about it. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 18:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
# {{Support}} That is fair. I don't see why some nominations in that page last up to a month when by that time, everyone has forgotten about it. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 18:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
# {{Support}} I think 1 week is definitely reasonable [[User:Luke2505|Luke2505]] ([[User talk:Luke2505|talk]]) 18:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
# {{Support}} I think 1 week is definitely reasonable [[User:Luke2505|Luke2505]] ([[User talk:Luke2505|talk]]) 18:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
# {{Support}} Cool idea! [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 18:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
Revision as of 18:55, 9 February 2023
I have noticed that AVID:Featured Image Nominations is getting quite cluttered with nominations, so I propose a 1 week voting period similar to the RfC. That way, the addition of images will flow better. Dominicmgm (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support That is fair. I don't see why some nominations in that page last up to a month when by that time, everyone has forgotten about it. Camenati (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)- Support I think 1 week is definitely reasonable Luke2505 (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support Cool idea!
(Talk to Me!) 18:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
