AVID:Requests for Comment/Add a time limit to featured image proposals: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7:
# {{Support}} per everyone else. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 22:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Support}} <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 06:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Support}} per above. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 15:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
===Abstain===
| |||
Revision as of 15:38, 10 February 2023
I have noticed that AVID:Featured Image Nominations is getting quite cluttered with nominations, so I propose a 1 week voting period similar to the RfC. That way, the addition of images will flow better. Dominicmgm (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support That is fair. I don't see why some nominations in that page last up to a month when by that time, everyone has forgotten about it. Camenati (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)- Support I think 1 week is definitely reasonable Luke2505 (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support Cool idea!
(Talk to Me!) 18:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC) - Support Absolutely!
(talk) 21:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC) - Support per everyone else.
· Talk · Edits 22:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC) - Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 06:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support per above.
(Lets chat!) 15:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
