AVID:Requests for Comment/Allow copyrights exemptions for pictures only for templates: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
#{{Oppose}} <code><nowiki>{{Other capture}}</nowiki></code>and <code><nowiki>{{Unsure}}</nowiki></code> exist for this reason. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 23:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} <code><nowiki>{{Other capture}}</nowiki></code>and <code><nowiki>{{Unsure}}</nowiki></code> exist for this reason. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 23:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Oppose}} per EMG. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 00:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
Revision as of 00:04, 24 March 2023
A new exemption
So, we now have licensing for pictures, and have to add the correct templates to them. Well, I think we should make an exemption for pictures uploaded exclusively for a template or an infobox. Because, the pictures for infoboxes and templates may not be in the public domain, and they aren't logos, so how about we allow non-public domain, non-logo pictures, uploaded solely for an infobox or a template? 
13:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose {{Other capture}}and{{Unsure}}exist for this reason.
(Lets chat!) 23:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)- Oppose per EMG.
· Talk · Edits 00:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
