AVID:Requests for Comment/Availability rename: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Why rename Availability?: closed |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive top|'''Unsuccessful''' due to overwhelming early opposition and author withdrawal. --[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 16:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
==Why rename Availability?== |
==Why rename Availability?== |
||
I wasn't aware of a recent revamp until very recently. But I would've support it as I'm sick of the Availability scale. |
I wasn't aware of a recent revamp until very recently. But I would've support it as I'm sick of the Availability scale. |
||
Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
* Per those opposes, welp should we just rename Availability and not anything else? I don’t wanna cause drama, but the rarities and common statuses of logos like [[T.A.T. Communications Company]] and [[Sony Pictures Television]] are kinda important. If any user is to abandon user consensus, are we gonna remove the Legacy section from the site? [[User:Rainbow Puppy|Rainbow Puppy]] ([[User talk:Rainbow Puppy|talk]]) 23:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC) |
* Per those opposes, welp should we just rename Availability and not anything else? I don’t wanna cause drama, but the rarities and common statuses of logos like [[T.A.T. Communications Company]] and [[Sony Pictures Television]] are kinda important. If any user is to abandon user consensus, are we gonna remove the Legacy section from the site? [[User:Rainbow Puppy|Rainbow Puppy]] ([[User talk:Rainbow Puppy|talk]]) 23:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
{{archive bottom}} |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
Revision as of 16:17, 30 August 2023