AVID:Requests for Comment/Ban lengthy "Strongest oppose since" intros: Difference between revisions
→Oppose: Reply |
→Support: Reply |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
{{Support}} I understand it's just joking around but at the end of the day it's kinda annoying [[User:Airvibes|Airvibes]] ([[User talk:Airvibes|talk]]) 20:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC) |
{{Support}} I understand it's just joking around but at the end of the day it's kinda annoying [[User:Airvibes|Airvibes]] ([[User talk:Airvibes|talk]]) 20:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Just because they are annoying doesn't mean we have to downright ban them [[File:DW Signature.gif|249px|link=User:DanteWilliams]]([[User talk:DanteWilliams|• '''USER TALK!''' •]]) 20:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
Revision as of 20:22, 12 January 2023
I know it's all in good fun and all, but at the end of the day it's unnecessary and adds nothing to what is being said. "Strongest oppose/support" should be enough as is.
Support
Support I understand it's just joking around but at the end of the day it's kinda annoying Airvibes (talk) 20:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Just because they are annoying doesn't mean we have to downright ban them
(• USER TALK! •) 20:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose since you made this RFC. There is basically no problem with this. It's just a fun way to make a joke. (• USER TALK! •) 19:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- It's gotten way out of hand recently, and again - they really add nothing to the discussion. It's just unnecessary fluff. NancerAVID (talk) 20:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Dude, it's really not a problem. It's just a joke. And as a matter of fact, they aren't really lengthy either. It's not like they are 20 words; plus, most aren't even 15 words. Also, if they add nothing to the discussion, why so mad at them? (• USER TALK! •) 20:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- What's the joke? NancerAVID (talk) 20:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- The joke is having a funny follow-up sentence. That's literally the joke. It's funny, wholesome, and makes the voting system a whole lot more fun. (• USER TALK! •) 20:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- What Dante said
(The Third Place) 20:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- What Dante said
- The joke is having a funny follow-up sentence. That's literally the joke. It's funny, wholesome, and makes the voting system a whole lot more fun.
- What's the joke? NancerAVID (talk) 20:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Dude, it's really not a problem. It's just a joke. And as a matter of fact, they aren't really lengthy either. It's not like they are 20 words; plus, most aren't even 15 words. Also, if they add nothing to the discussion, why so mad at them?
Oppose for now. They should stay but have a word cap of maybe 10 or so. JrStudios (talk) 20:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Eh, I admit it is kinda annoying to watch those over and over but not THAT much to reach the point of banning them. Of course they add nothing to the discussion but, let 'em be, they don't harm anyone. Jet Dzhet (talk) 20:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose since Sesame Street stopped using the Funky Chimes music in 1992 for Season 24. Someone can't take a joke (The Third Place) 20:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- ...what's the joke? You're just adding random information completely unrelated to the actual topic on the end. NancerAVID (talk) 20:14, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
