AVID:Requests for Comment/Can You Put All "Legacy" On All AVID Pages?: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
imported>IAmThe789Guy No edit summary |
imported>CrageMcle →Oppose: Reply |
||
Line 9:
# {{Oppose}} Sorry, but it defeats one of the purposes of why we switched to Legacy in the first place. It's a waste of a section. For those reasons I'm out. [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 19:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} Not only does this one share the same issue as your last RFC (bad grammar), but we don't need the legacy section on EVERY page. Most of the logos don't have a lasting legacy. [[User:IAmThe789Guy|IAmThe789Guy]] ([[User talk:IAmThe789Guy|talk]]) 20:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
#:Okay 🥲 [[File:pathe8.jpeg|100px|link=User:CrageMcle]] ([[User talk:CrageMcle|Come to my talk page!!1!1!1!1!1!!1]]) 20:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
===Comments===
| |||
Revision as of 20:01, 5 February 2023
Can You Put All "Legacy" On All AVID Pages?
Could you put all "Legacy" on all Avid pages? That's because it looks the same as the old one like "Legacy: None" but recently Legacy: None has been removed but it has to do with that but for pages that have Legacy: What to Say Something Made by the Editor. were simply removed for unknown reasons could you put ALL Legacy on ALL AVID pages? Except it has Legacy: None? 
(Come to my talk page!!1!1!1!1!1!!1) 19:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose You're wanting the section to have the same old treatment the Editor's Note has (because...reasons) but like that section, the issue with "Legacy: None" is that it is pointless. No legacy? Then why bring it up? "Legacy: None" is what we were trying to get rid of when it replaced the Editor's Note. C̴̣̳̟͇̳͓̀̆̿Ā̸̛̛̝͎̗̲̯̲̰͠M̷̢̯̗̱͎̗̰̈̌̎͜E̶͖̪̽̓͒N̵̗̘̩͇̫̭̤̙̈́̑͜A̸̼̫̯̮̼̟̲̫̲̍̈́̐͑̑̓̎̀̎̍̀͜T̵̡̨̧̪̼͓̜͉͇͎́I̵̧͍̥̗͕͐ͅ 19:48, 5 February 2023 (UTC)- Oppose Sorry, but it defeats one of the purposes of why we switched to Legacy in the first place. It's a waste of a section. For those reasons I'm out. Compooper (talk) 19:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Not only does this one share the same issue as your last RFC (bad grammar), but we don't need the legacy section on EVERY page. Most of the logos don't have a lasting legacy. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 20:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Okay 🥲 (Come to my talk page!!1!1!1!1!1!!1) 20:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Okay 🥲
