AVID:Requests for Comment/Can You Put All "Legacy" On All AVID Pages?

The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

AVID:SNOW close given immediate consensus against Compooper (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

---

Can You Put All "Legacy" On All AVID Pages?

Could you put all "Legacy" on all Avid pages? That's because it looks the same as the old one like "Legacy: None" but recently Legacy: None has been removed but it has to do with that but for pages that have Legacy: What to Say Something Made by the Editor. were simply removed for unknown reasons could you put ALL Legacy on ALL AVID pages? Except it has Legacy: None? (Come to my talk page!!1!1!1!1!1!!1) 19:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose You're wanting the section to have the same old treatment the Editor's Note has (because...reasons) but like that section, the issue here is that it often feels like a repurposed Cheesy/Scare Factor. This leads me to believe you're someone who wants opinionated critiques back on articles when we've been trying to distance ourselves away from that for many years. C̴̣̳̟͇̳͓̀̆̿Ā̸̛̛̝͎̗̲̯̲̰͠M̷̢̯̗̱͎̗̰̈̌̎͜E̶͖̪̽̓͒N̵̗̘̩͇̫̭̤̙̈́̑͜A̸̼̫̯̮̼̟̲̫̲̍̈́̐͑̑̓̎̀̎̍̀͜T̵̡̨̧̪̼͓̜͉͇͎́I̵̧͍̥̗͕͐ͅ 19:48, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
2. Oppose Sorry, but it defeats one of the purposes of why we switched to Legacy in the first place. It's a waste of a section. For those reasons I'm out. Compooper (talk) 19:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
3. Oppose Not only does this one share the same issue as your last RFC (bad grammar), but we don't need the legacy section on EVERY page. Most of the logos don't have a lasting legacy. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 20:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

   Okay 🥲 (Come to my talk page!!1!1!1!1!1!!1) 20:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

   But why was Legacy: Written something removed? What should be removed is Legacy: None (Come to my talk page!!1!1!1!1!1!!1) 20:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

   I don't understand what you're trying to say. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

   /

   (Come to my talk page!!1!1!1!1!1!!1) 20:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

4. Oppose simply because of how utterly incomprehensible this is (The Third Place) 20:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
5. Oppose per everyone else. · Talk · Edits 20:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
6. Oppose Per everyone Luke2505 (talk) 21:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

   I already understand, okay? (Come to my talk page!!1!1!1!1!1!!1) 21:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

7. Oppose I highly conclude this as unconstitutional. ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 13:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
8. Oppose per everyone. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 18:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
9. Oppose Bad idea! (Talk to Me!) 19:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
10. Oppose Why? ForcedExcess26 (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
11. Oppose not really, I don't think it's needed for all articles. if a legacy note doesn't have anything mentioned, it shouldn't be there. (talk) 21:26, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

    I liked your signature (Come to my talk page!!1!1!1!1!1!!1) 23:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments

1.  Comment: I request SNOW closure. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 17:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
   • Yeah, same here. Gilby1385 (talk) 12:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

   I third this (Lets chat!) 12:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

   I fourth this. · Talk · Edits 21:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

   I fifth this ForcedExcess26 (talk) 21:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

   i 900th this (The Third Place) 21:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

   Calling further attention to this to request SNOW closure (Lets chat!) 11:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.