AVID:Requests for Comment/Clearer guidelines for merging pages: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
m Copying from Category:Requests for Comment to Category:Passed Requests for Comment using Cat-a-lot |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:The following discussion is closed. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
|||
::Closing as '''passed'''. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 12:06, 18 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
Sometimes, I don't understand how some companies are merged together into a single article whereas others are split from one another. This includes the [[Columbia TriStar Television]] being split off from the [[Sony Pictures Television]] page (understandably due to their large size), whereas pages such as [[ITV Studios]] have two long sections merged together. What makes the former alright to split but not the latter? Likewise, vanity card articles such as the [[Wayans Bros. Companies]] and [[GK Productions]] are merged just because they are from the same person/people, when they are likely not directly related to one another, especially when two of those cards are used concurrently. |
Sometimes, I don't understand how some companies are merged together into a single article whereas others are split from one another. This includes the [[Columbia TriStar Television]] being split off from the [[Sony Pictures Television]] page (understandably due to their large size), whereas pages such as [[ITV Studios]] have two long sections merged together. What makes the former alright to split but not the latter? Likewise, vanity card articles such as the [[Wayans Bros. Companies]] and [[GK Productions]] are merged just because they are from the same person/people, when they are likely not directly related to one another, especially when two of those cards are used concurrently. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
#{{Support|Strong}} You get my vote specifically because I wanna see TAT merge with Embassy [[User:CharlieFiddlesticks|CharlieFiddlesticks]] ([[User talk:CharlieFiddlesticks|talk]]) 01:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC) |
#{{Support|Strong}} You get my vote specifically because I wanna see TAT merge with Embassy [[User:CharlieFiddlesticks|CharlieFiddlesticks]] ([[User talk:CharlieFiddlesticks|talk]]) 01:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
#{{Support|strongest}}<br>Per everyone. Also because I have previously expressed interest in seeing the [[Platinum Disc Corporation]] page merge with the [[Echo Bridge Home Entertainment]] page, so I'm all for this.<br>[[User:Nova|★ Nova]] ([[User talk:Nova|talk]]) 18:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC) |
#{{Support|strongest}}<br>Per everyone. Also because I have previously expressed interest in seeing the [[Platinum Disc Corporation]] page merge with the [[Echo Bridge Home Entertainment]] page, so I'm all for this.<br>[[User:Nova|★ Nova]] ([[User talk:Nova|talk]]) 18:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
#{{support}} [[User:Blad|Blad]] ([[User talk:Blad|talk]]) 14:35, 17 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
| Line 16: | Line 21: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
</div> |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
[[Category:Passed Requests for Comment]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 08:23, 28 February 2023
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Sometimes, I don't understand how some companies are merged together into a single article whereas others are split from one another. This includes the Columbia TriStar Television being split off from the Sony Pictures Television page (understandably due to their large size), whereas pages such as ITV Studios have two long sections merged together. What makes the former alright to split but not the latter? Likewise, vanity card articles such as the Wayans Bros. Companies and GK Productions are merged just because they are from the same person/people, when they are likely not directly related to one another, especially when two of those cards are used concurrently.
Something about that feels off and inconsistent. Should there be a clear guideline on how merging those type of pages work? This is particularly focusing on their page size and relation with another company. Camenati (talk) 22:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support. This has been the cause of occasional edit wars for some time now and some consistent guidelines are needed. The distinction should be between simple name changes, e.g. 20th Century Fox -> 20th Century Studios, and distinct successor companies, such as Revue -> Universal Television.- Support Good idea. ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper (talk) 00:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per what Hb said. Logohub (talk) 00:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support As per everybody else.
· Talk · Edits 14:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC) - Support You get my vote specifically because I wanna see TAT merge with Embassy CharlieFiddlesticks (talk) 01:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support
Per everyone. Also because I have previously expressed interest in seeing the Platinum Disc Corporation page merge with the Echo Bridge Home Entertainment page, so I'm all for this.
★ Nova (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC) - Support Blad (talk) 14:35, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
