AVID:Requests for Comment/Controversial logos section: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Compooper (talk | contribs)
Compooper (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archive top|[[AVID:SNOW|SNOW]] close. This request has {{Rejected|failed}}. [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 00:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)}}
==Controversial logos==
==Controversial logos==
Some logos are controversial, for many reasons. How about we do a category containing these type of logos? Is this also opinionated?
Some logos are controversial, for many reasons. How about we do a category containing these type of logos? Is this also opinionated?
Line 11: Line 12:
# {{Oppose}} we shouldn't have redundant categories. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 13:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} we shouldn't have redundant categories. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 13:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} Per everyone [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} Per everyone [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} Per all. Also, please make sure that you will create a RfC without unnecessary categories thing. [[User:Cattotld|Cattotld]] ([[User talk:Cattotld|talk]]) 13:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} Unconstitutional. [[User:-InfintyRoberts-|∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞]] ([[User talk:-InfintyRoberts-|꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂]]) | ([[Special:Contributions/-InfintyRoberts-|꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂]]) 14:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} As per everyone above [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 16:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 16:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}}. We are not the Reception Wikis. [[User:Dominicmgm|Dominicmgm]] ([[User talk:Dominicmgm|talk]]) 17:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} For a while I thought this was for logos with controversial content (gore, sexuality), but we have the content warning guidances and categories for those. [[User:SnowflakesOmega|SnowflakesOmega]] ([[User talk:SnowflakesOmega|talk]]) 21:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} per everybody else. This is something CLG Wiki and Qualitipedia would do. We're neither. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 22:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)


===Comments===
===Comments===
{{Comment}} Is there anything I do an RfC for which isn't hated by everyone? [[User:Sonicfan19198282|Sonicfan19198282]] ([[User talk:Sonicfan19198282|talk]]) 18:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

:It's just that your ideas tend to be the ones we want to avoid. CLG Wiki was infamous for being way too opinionated. This is one such idea. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 22:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
{{Archive bottom}}

Latest revision as of 00:13, 10 February 2023


Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.