AVID:Requests for Comment/Controversial logos section: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
# {{Oppose}} we shouldn't have redundant categories. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 13:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
# {{Oppose}} we shouldn't have redundant categories. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 13:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
# {{Oppose}} Per everyone [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
# {{Oppose}} Per everyone [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
# {{Oppose}} Per all. Also, please make sure that you will create a RfC without unnecessary categories thing. [[User:Cattotld|Cattotld]] ([[User talk:Cattotld| |
# {{Oppose}} Per all. Also, please make sure that you will create a RfC without unnecessary categories thing. [[User:Cattotld|Cattotld]] ([[User talk:Cattotld|talk]]) 13:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
# {{Oppose}} Unconstitutional. [[User:-InfintyRoberts-|∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞]] ([[User talk:-InfintyRoberts-|꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂]]) | ([[Special:Contributions/-InfintyRoberts-|꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂]]) 14:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
# {{Oppose}} Unconstitutional. [[User:-InfintyRoberts-|∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞]] ([[User talk:-InfintyRoberts-|꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂]]) | ([[Special:Contributions/-InfintyRoberts-|꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂]]) 14:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Oppose}} As per everyone above [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 16:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} As per everyone above [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 16:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:16, 9 February 2023
Controversial logos
Some logos are controversial, for many reasons. How about we do a category containing these type of logos? Is this also opinionated?
Support
Support 
(The Third Place) 13:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose Yeah it is. It feels more like a CLG Wiki thing. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)- Oppose We're called Audiovisual Identity Database, not Logo Reception Wiki.
(Lets chat!) 13:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC) - Oppose we shouldn't have redundant categories. Logohub (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per everyone Compooper (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per all. Also, please make sure that you will create a RfC without unnecessary categories thing. Cattotld (talk) 13:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Unconstitutional. ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 14:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose As per everyone above
(Talk to Me!) 16:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
