AVID:Requests for Comment/Controversial logos section: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
# {{Oppose}} <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 16:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
# {{Oppose}} <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 16:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
# {{Oppose}}. We are not the Reception Wikis. [[User:Dominicmgm|Dominicmgm]] ([[User talk:Dominicmgm|talk]]) 17:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
# {{Oppose}}. We are not the Reception Wikis. [[User:Dominicmgm|Dominicmgm]] ([[User talk:Dominicmgm|talk]]) 17:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Oppose}} For a while I thought this was for logos with controversial content (gore, sexuality), but we have the content warning guidances and categories for those. [[User:SnowflakesOmega|SnowflakesOmega]] ([[User talk:SnowflakesOmega|talk]]) 21:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
Revision as of 21:49, 9 February 2023
Controversial logos
Some logos are controversial, for many reasons. How about we do a category containing these type of logos? Is this also opinionated?
Support
Support 
(The Third Place) 13:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose Yeah it is. It feels more like a CLG Wiki thing. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)- Oppose We're called Audiovisual Identity Database, not Logo Reception Wiki.
(Lets chat!) 13:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC) - Oppose we shouldn't have redundant categories. Logohub (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per everyone Compooper (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per all. Also, please make sure that you will create a RfC without unnecessary categories thing. Cattotld (talk) 13:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Unconstitutional. ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 14:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose As per everyone above
(Talk to Me!) 16:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC) - Oppose Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. We are not the Reception Wikis. Dominicmgm (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose For a while I thought this was for logos with controversial content (gore, sexuality), but we have the content warning guidances and categories for those. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Comments
Comment: Is there anything I do an RfC for which isn't hated by everyone? Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
