AVID:Requests for Comment/Define "POV" in removing Legacy sections: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Copying from Category:Requests for Comment to Category:Passed Requests for Comment using Cat-a-lot |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
:The following discussion is closed. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
::Closing as '''passed''', with a majority of votes on "YES". ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 18:44, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
----
So I see there's a bit of a conflict in what's considered "POV".
Line 35 ⟶ 40:
:Source to that? I think that most logos aren't a "favorite of many" but instead just treated more indifferently. There are also logos that are disliked. Most of the people saying yes seem to understand the question. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 06:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
:'''|''' ''But encouraging the vague "favorite of many" statement is a bad idea.''
:No it's not. Look around
:'''|''' ''Almost every logo is a "favorite of many".''
:True but again, if the reputation is well-known, absolutely I think it should be included. I think you are just going off YOUR own belief on what you think it means.<br> -<span style="font-family:'AVID Sans';">Compooper</span> 11:15, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
----
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
</div>
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Passed Requests for Comment]]
|