AVID:Requests for Comment/Define "POV" in removing Legacy sections: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
m Copying from Category:Requests for Comment to Category:Passed Requests for Comment using Cat-a-lot |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:The following discussion is closed. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
|||
::Closing as '''passed''', with a majority of votes on "YES". ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 18:44, 2 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
So I see there's a bit of a conflict in what's considered "POV". |
So I see there's a bit of a conflict in what's considered "POV". |
||
Line 39: | Line 44: | ||
:'''|''' ''Almost every logo is a "favorite of many".'' |
:'''|''' ''Almost every logo is a "favorite of many".'' |
||
:True but again, if the reputation is well-known, absolutely I think it should be included. I think you are just going off YOUR own belief on what you think it means.<br> -<span style="font-family:'AVID Sans';">Compooper</span> 11:15, 1 December 2022 (UTC) |
:True but again, if the reputation is well-known, absolutely I think it should be included. I think you are just going off YOUR own belief on what you think it means.<br> -<span style="font-family:'AVID Sans';">Compooper</span> 11:15, 1 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
---- |
|||
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
|||
</div> |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
[[Category:Passed Requests for Comment]] |