AVID:Requests for Comment/Discontinue use of the Rollbacker role: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Line 8:
#{{Support}} because Rollback is pretty much deprecated by the wiki at this point
#{{Support}} <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 11:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} per others. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 12:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
===Abstain===
| |||
Revision as of 12:08, 14 April 2023
Discontinue use of the Rollbacker role
With the introduction of the Moderator role, having a role solely for rollbacking seems to be mostly useless, as most people would be more likely to apply for moderator instead. With this in mind, I think keeping the role in use would be a waste, as to me, it's clear nobody is going to use it. What do you all think? 
(Lets chat!) 05:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support most people would probably go for mod rather than rollback. Logohub (talk) 06:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)- Support this role is useless ForcedExcess26 (talk) 08:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support as rollbacker is made redundant by a full on moderation team, and the use of the moderation extension which minimizes the sort of things you'd actually use rollback for. --Raidarr (talk) 08:38, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support I think the Rollbacker role is just a waste of time. I don't know why it even exists!
(Talk to Me!) 08:45, 14 April 2023 (UTC) - Support because Rollback is pretty much deprecated by the wiki at this point
- Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support per others.
· Talk · Edits 12:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
