AVID:Requests for Comment/Have Captions for All Images: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Fix. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4:
===Support===
{{Support}} for logos with more than one specific variant. It sure will be handy. On the other hand… <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 16:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
===Abstain===
Line 10:
===Oppose===
{{Oppose}} for doing it on all images. I don’t think it’s necessary to caption one logo variant. Something like “Original variant” as a caption for one capture seems redundant. <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 16:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
===Comments===
|
Revision as of 16:07, 1 February 2023
I have been noticing thaton some pages, some captions are missing for some images. An image without a caption does not tell what the version of the logo is. By having a caption for every image, it improves the article further and tells what the version of the logo looks like. ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 14:57, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support for logos with more than one specific variant. It sure will be handy. On the other hand… Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose for doing it on all images. I don’t think it’s necessary to caption one logo variant. Something like “Original variant” as a caption for one capture seems redundant. Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)