AVID:Requests for Comment/Have Captions for All Images: Difference between revisions
→Oppose: Reply |
Fix. |
||
Line 1:
I have been noticing thaton some pages, some captions are missing for some images. An image without a caption does not tell what the version of the logo is. By having a caption for every image, it improves the article further and tells what the version of the logo looks like. This does not apply to logos that have just one variant, or is a one-off logo. (Updated February 1, 2023 at 12:26 PM EST) [[User:-InfintyRoberts-|∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞]] ([[User talk:-InfintyRoberts-|꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂]]) | ([[Special:Contributions/-InfintyRoberts-|꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂]]) 14:57, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
| |||
Revision as of 17:26, 1 February 2023
I have been noticing thaton some pages, some captions are missing for some images. An image without a caption does not tell what the version of the logo is. By having a caption for every image, it improves the article further and tells what the version of the logo looks like. This does not apply to logos that have just one variant, or is a one-off logo. (Updated February 1, 2023 at 12:26 PM EST) ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 14:57, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support for logos with more than one specific variant. It sure will be handy. On the other hand… Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose for doing it on all images. I don’t think it’s necessary to caption one logo variant. Something like “Original variant” as a caption for one capture seems redundant. Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- The goal was to have captions on all images (except for logos that have just one variant). ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 16:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Doctorine. Logohub (talk) 16:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
