AVID:Requests for Comment/How about graphics information?: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
#{{Oppose}} per above. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 20:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} per above. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 20:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Oppose}} Would've been interesting, but due to the fact that we don't know what or who made a lot of the logos, we can't have TBAs popping up all over the place on these pages. Plus, I think two more sections would make the reading time longer and would be overall completely redundant. So I'm out on this one. [[User:Vmoney25|Vmoney25]], [[User talk:Vmoney25|talk]], and my [[User:Vmoney25/sandbox|sandbox]]. 9:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} Would've been interesting, but due to the fact that we don't know what or who made a lot of the logos, we can't have TBAs popping up all over the place on these pages. Plus, I think two more sections would make the reading time longer and would be overall completely redundant. So I'm out on this one. [[User:Vmoney25|Vmoney25]], [[User talk:Vmoney25|talk]], and my [[User:Vmoney25/sandbox|sandbox]]. 9:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Oppose}}. Per above, this relies on us knowing what kind of hardware and software was used for each and every single logo. It'd be almost completely unused, and where we do know this information, we can already fit this in the Technique section. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 09:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
Revision as of 09:17, 7 June 2023
How about graphics information?
Is it possible to describe graphics information like this?
Computer System: Silicon Graphics Indigo
Animation Software: Alias Wavefront PowerAnimator
Try to look up SIGGRAPH conferences for research. For example: https://history.siggraph.org/conference/siggraph-1988-15th-annual-conference-on-computer-graphics-and-interactive-techniques/
Can we do that?
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose I don't think this would work as a dedicated section, mainly because most logos we have no idea what graphics software or specialised equipment they used, but also because this kind of information is usually more suited for the Trivia or Technique sections, which are both much more broad and can cover a wider range of information. LoganStuff (talk) 18:28, 6 June 2023 (UTC)- Oppose Per above. Gilby1385 (talk) 20:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per above.
· Talk · Edits 20:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC) - Oppose Would've been interesting, but due to the fact that we don't know what or who made a lot of the logos, we can't have TBAs popping up all over the place on these pages. Plus, I think two more sections would make the reading time longer and would be overall completely redundant. So I'm out on this one. Vmoney25, talk, and my sandbox. 9:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. Per above, this relies on us knowing what kind of hardware and software was used for each and every single logo. It'd be almost completely unused, and where we do know this information, we can already fit this in the Technique section.
(Lets chat!) 09:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
