AVID:Requests for Comment/Introduce film leaders: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 14:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
#{{Abstain}} I have mixed feelings about that, to be honest. Not sure why, but I do. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 10:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Abstain}} I have mixed feelings about that, to be honest. Not sure why, but I do. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 10:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 14:14, 28 July 2023
Introduce film leaders
I think film leaders are considered audiovisual identity/ephemera. Some even have logo elements (such as these EUE Screen Gems leaders below):
Or these other film leaders:
I'd like to see your opinions on this.
Support
Abstain
Abstain I have mixed feelings about that, to be honest. Not sure why, but I do. Gilby1385 (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
