AVID:Requests for Comment/Introduce film leaders: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "{{subst:RfC Page|Introduce film leaders|I think film leaders are considered audiovisual identity/ephemera. Some even have logo elements (such as these EUE Screen Gems leaders below): {{youtube|id=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfCNMaA4RIU|id2=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nkfWracS00}} Or these other film leaders: {{youtube|id=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ox0Db7EiT6g|id2=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKezMJV2_HU|id3=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMtEaNG2l6..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
#{{Abstain}} I have mixed feelings about that, to be honest. Not sure why, but I do. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 10:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
Revision as of 10:54, 28 July 2023
Introduce film leaders
I think film leaders are considered audiovisual identity/ephemera. Some even have logo elements (such as these EUE Screen Gems leaders below):
Or these other film leaders:
I'd like to see your opinions on this.
Support
Abstain
Abstain I have mixed feelings about that, to be honest. Not sure why, but I do. Gilby1385 (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
