AVID:Requests for Comment/Introduce film leaders: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
#{{Support}} Not sure how we're gon' implement it, but I'm in. [[User:AUnnamedDragon|AUnnamedDragon]] 12:16 PM, August 1, 2023 |
#{{Support}} Not sure how we're gon' implement it, but I'm in. [[User:AUnnamedDragon|AUnnamedDragon]] 12:16 PM, August 1, 2023 |
||
(CET) |
(CET) |
||
#{{Support}} Well, if you say film leaders are audiovisual identity, then im in. [[File:NUGGIE-LOGO.svg|120px|link=User:Nuggie]] 11:58, 2 August 2023 |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
Revision as of 15:58, 2 August 2023
Introduce film leaders
I think film leaders are considered audiovisual identity/ephemera. Some even have logo elements (such as these EUE Screen Gems leaders below):
Or these other film leaders:
I'd like to see your opinions on this.
Support
- Support · Talk · Edits 14:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support LoganStuff (talk) 18:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support Eternity Media Group (talk) 04:50, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 15:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Support Not sure how we're gon' implement it, but I'm in. AUnnamedDragon 12:16 PM, August 1, 2023
(CET)
Abstain
- Abstain I have mixed feelings about that, to be honest. Not sure why, but I do. Gilby1385 (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)