AVID:Requests for Comment/Make background sections mandatory: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{RFC Draft |
{{RFC Draft |
||
|submit=Yes |
|submit=Yes |
||
|staffreason1={{Approved}} [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 17:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
==Make background sections mandatory== |
==Make background sections mandatory== |
Revision as of 17:40, 26 June 2024
This proposal was submitted for staff review. If a week has passed and this proposal is still not reviewed, please notify site staff. Please do not vote on the RFC yet. If one or two staff members abstain or decline the draft, the publisher can continue working on it to address the issues raised. To add reasoning, use the following parameters "staffreason1" or "staffreason2" Staff member 1: Approved Camenati (talk) 17:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC) Staff member 2: Last edited by Camenati (talk | contribs) 3 months ago. (Update) |
Make background sections mandatory
I believe background sections should be mandatory. Readers viewing a page may be confused or interested on what the logo or identity is for, the history of the company, what the company is known for, etc. After all, we're an encyclopedia. I think readers should be informed of what the logo is made for.
I think, if information is available on the internet, it should be included in the background section. Otherwise, something like "X is an American film production company founded by Y" should be acceptable, but only if there's no information available on the internet. What do you think? Logoarto (talk) 17:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)