AVID:Requests for Comment/Make the availability section for commercial tags optional/only to state specific examples: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
{{RFC Draft
|submit=Yes
|staffreason1='''Approved'''. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 18:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
}}
==Make the availability section for commercial tags optional/only to state specific examples==
|
Revision as of 18:22, 18 May 2024
![]() | This proposal was submitted for staff review. If a week has passed and this proposal is still not reviewed, please notify site staff. Please do not vote on the RFC yet. If one or two staff members abstain or decline the draft, the publisher can continue working on it to address the issues raised. To add reasoning, use the following parameters "staffreason1" or "staffreason2" Staff member 1: Approved. Camenati (talk) 18:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Staff member 2: Last edited by Camenati (talk | contribs) 3 months ago. (Update) |
Make the availability section for commercial tags optional/only to state specific examples
Reiterating what TheNintendoGuy9009 said to me: there might be a couple of famous commercials for brands out there but that doesn't mean all brands have specific commercials.
Most of the time, brands will use the tag for hundreds of often unrelated commercials. Many commercials don't have names and specific details.
I think the availability section should be optional and only used to state specific examples, i.e. This endtag is seen on the infamous X commercial about Y, something like that, or if the tag is a one-off.