AVID:Requests for Comment/Music/Sounds section revamp: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} Oh. Yes. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 23:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} Again, yes. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 23:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
Revision as of 23:21, 4 October 2023
i have got two proposals for revamps of the Music/Sounds section:
Rename "Music/Sounds" to "Audio"
as the title would imply, i am proposing the rename of the "Music/Sounds" section to just "Audio". reasons being:
- to me, the Music/Sounds name sounds very clunky, and the use of the word Sounds makes me think that whoever named that forgot about the word Audio
- in a similar manner to the FX rename to Technique, Audio is more concise than Music/Sounds
- accounts for other audio in logos. e.g. voiceovers
- ties in with the wiki name
Diberhaze (talk) 22:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Section absent in case of no audio
Again, Like the title says, if a logo doesn't have audio, the section is not there instead of just saying None.
Diberhaze (talk) 22:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
