AVID:Requests for Comment/Music/Sounds section revamp: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} Oh. Yes. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 23:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} Oh. Yes. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 23:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Support}} It makes sense with a simpler term like "Audio" and I can really see your points regarding this section's new direction... [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 00:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
#{{Oppose}} Same reason as above. [[User:TPatKB|TPatKB (AKA Mr Vadimon)]] ([[User talk:TPatKB|this is my talk page]]) 00:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} Same reason as above. [[User:TPatKB|TPatKB (AKA Mr Vadimon)]] ([[User talk:TPatKB|this is my talk page]]) 00:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Oppose}} ...however, I don't agree with removing it if it has no songs or sound effects. That is like saying we should remove the Technique section if it is a still logo, which is necessary if people want to know if a logo is animated or has accompanying audio. It can also provide more detail to logos that don't have video captures available or those that are dead. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 00:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
Revision as of 00:07, 5 October 2023
i have got two proposals for revamps of the Music/Sounds section:
Rename "Music/Sounds" to "Audio"
as the title would imply, i am proposing the rename of the "Music/Sounds" section to just "Audio". reasons being:
- to me, the Music/Sounds name sounds very clunky, and the use of the word Sounds makes me think that whoever named that forgot about the word Audio
- in a similar manner to the FX rename to Technique, Audio is more concise than Music/Sounds
- accounts for other audio in logos. e.g. voiceovers
- ties in with the wiki name
Diberhaze (talk) 22:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support Oh. Yes.
· Talk · Edits 23:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Support It makes sense with a simpler term like "Audio" and I can really see your points regarding this section's new direction... Camenati (talk) 00:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose It seems like a good idea, but unfortunately I need to oppose it because I don't want a rename, I just find it annoying that the Wiki is doing more and more unnecessary rebrands. TPatKB (AKA Mr Vadimon) (this is my talk page) 00:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Comments
Section absent in case of no audio
Again, Like the title says, if a logo doesn't have audio, the section is not there instead of just saying None.
Diberhaze (talk) 22:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose Same reason as above. TPatKB (AKA Mr Vadimon) (this is my talk page) 00:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Oppose ...however, I don't agree with removing it if it has no songs or sound effects. That is like saying we should remove the Technique section if it is a still logo, which is necessary if people want to know if a logo is animated or has accompanying audio. It can also provide more detail to logos that don't have video captures available or those that are dead. Camenati (talk) 00:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)