AVID:Requests for Comment/New rules for Availability section and other changes: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
→Oppose: Reply |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:The following discussion is closed. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
|||
::Closing as '''failed''', with a majority of votes falling under Oppose. [[User:HibiscusCrown20|HibiscusCrown20]] ([[User talk:HibiscusCrown20|talk]]) 15:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
Should we ban such phrases like "Seen on films/shows by this company from this time" and similar phrases from the Availability section? |
Should we ban such phrases like "Seen on films/shows by this company from this time" and similar phrases from the Availability section? |
||