AVID:Requests for Comment/Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Just in case. Revert if you have a good reason to. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14:
===Support===
#{{Support}} I guess we could. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 16:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} as I already backed this on the server. [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 16:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
===Abstain===
|
Revision as of 16:43, 4 December 2023
Notability guidelines
I think we should introduce proper notability guidelines. I have come up with a rough draft below; feel free to contribute to this: A company must fulfill one of the following:
- Must have one of their films screened in a festival/theater. For youtube exclusives then they should follow the youtube notability guidelines
- Must have an official distributor
- Must have one of their series aired on television or a paid service; for free web series such as youtube exclusives then they should follow the youtube notability guidelines
- Must have a physical release
- Must have notable news coverage
- Must have been nominated for or won at least one award
- Must have funding from sponsorship/government funded
Solar also proposed the youtube notability guidelines' subscriber minimum to be 500k instead of 1 million and tbh I agree. Less restricting but still strict enough so the average youtube user wouldn't probably be included. - Previously unsigned comment by Logoarto
Support
- Support I guess we could. Gilby1385 (talk) 16:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support as I already backed this on the server. Compooper (talk) 16:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)