AVID:Requests for Comment/Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
#{{Oppose}} This isn't about notability. It's about documenting logos. And obscure companies are just as much of a company as the Big 5. They don't need external funding. They don't need awards. All they need is a film and a logo. [[User:Sonicfan19198282|Sonicfan19198282]] ([[User talk:Sonicfan19198282|talk]]) 09:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} This isn't about notability. It's about documenting logos. And obscure companies are just as much of a company as the Big 5. They don't need external funding. They don't need awards. All they need is a film and a logo. [[User:Sonicfan19198282|Sonicfan19198282]] ([[User talk:Sonicfan19198282|talk]]) 09:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
:We can't just include every single logo on every film, especially minor productions like college projects or school films. We oughta need proper guidelines to decide which should be included in the wiki and which shouldn't be. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 09:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
#:We can't just include every single logo on every film, especially minor productions like college projects or school films. We oughta need proper guidelines to decide which should be included in the wiki and which shouldn't be. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 09:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
Revision as of 12:32, 9 December 2023
Notability guidelines
I think we should introduce proper notability guidelines. I have come up with a rough draft below; feel free to contribute to this:
A company must fulfill one of the following:
- Must have one of their films screened in a festival/theater. For youtube exclusives then they should follow the youtube notability guidelines
- Must have an official distributor
- Must have one of their series aired on television or a paid service; for free web series such as youtube exclusives then they should follow the youtube notability guidelines
- Must have a physical release
- Must have news coverage (of its film/company/logo)
- Must have been nominated for or won at least one award
- Must have funding from sponsorship/government funded
Solar also proposed the youtube notability guidelines' subscriber minimum to be 500k instead of 1 million and tbh I agree. Less restricting but still strict enough so the average youtube user wouldn't probably be included. - Previously unsigned comment by Logoarto
Support
Support I guess we could. Gilby1385 (talk) 16:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)- Support as I already backed this on the server. Compooper (talk) 16:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support
· Talk · Edits 18:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC) - Support Only making the wiki a step better.
(lets play football) 20:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC) - Support Yuuko2K (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ForcedExcess26 (talk) 20:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support EsaïeGregoryPrickett (talk) 6:23, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support
(TALK•CONTRIBUTIONS) 04:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose This isn't about notability. It's about documenting logos. And obscure companies are just as much of a company as the Big 5. They don't need external funding. They don't need awards. All they need is a film and a logo. Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 09:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
