AVID:Requests for Comment/Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} I guess we could. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 16:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
Revision as of 16:13, 4 December 2023
Notability guidelines
I think we should introduce proper notability guidelines. I have come up with a rough draft below; feel free to contribute to this: A company must fulfill one of the following:
- Must have one of their films screened in a festival/theater. For youtube exclusives then they should follow the youtube notability guidelines
- Must have an official distributor
- Must have one of their series aired on television or a paid service; for free web series such as youtube exclusives then they should follow the youtube notability guidelines
- Must have a physical release
- Must have notable news coverage
- Must have been nominated for or won at least one award
- Must have funding from sponsorship/government funded
Solar also proposed the youtube notability guidelines' subscriber minimum to be 500k instead of 1 million and tbh I agree. Less restricting but still strict enough so the average youtube user wouldn't probably be included.
