AVID:Requests for Comment/Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
TheAmigo67 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
# I just would like to know if local television is disqualified by the new rules or not. That will influence my vote. I still thing the local networks should stay. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 06:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC) |
# I just would like to know if local television is disqualified by the new rules or not. That will influence my vote. I still thing the local networks should stay. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 06:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
::Don't worry, local TV is staying, as they aired on television. May be elaborated more if the guidelines page is made. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 07:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
Revision as of 07:34, 10 December 2023
Notability guidelines
I think we should introduce proper notability guidelines. I have come up with a rough draft below; feel free to contribute to this:
A company must fulfill one of the following:
- Must have one of their films screened in a festival/theater. For youtube exclusives then they should follow the youtube notability guidelines
- Must have an official distributor
- Must have one of their series aired on television or a paid service; for free web series such as youtube exclusives then they should follow the youtube notability guidelines
- Must have a physical release
- Must have news coverage (of its film/company/logo)
- Must have been nominated for or won at least one award
- Must have funding from sponsorship/government funded
Solar also proposed the youtube notability guidelines' subscriber minimum to be 500k instead of 1 million and tbh I agree. Less restricting but still strict enough so the average youtube user wouldn't probably be included. - Previously unsigned comment by Logoarto
Support
- Support I guess we could. Gilby1385 (talk) 16:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support as I already backed this on the server. Compooper (talk) 16:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support · Talk · Edits 18:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Only making the wiki a step better. (lets play football) 20:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Yuuko2K (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ForcedExcess26 (talk) 20:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support EsaïeGregoryPrickett (talk) 6:23, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support (TALK•CONTRIBUTIONS) 04:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nova (talk)
- Support Having a guide on notability can CERTAINLY ease confusion on what is considered notable. TheAmigo67 (talk) 07:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose This isn't about notability. It's about documenting logos. And obscure companies are just as much of a company as the Big 5. They don't need external funding. They don't need awards. All they need is a film and a logo. Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 09:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments
- I just would like to know if local television is disqualified by the new rules or not. That will influence my vote. I still thing the local networks should stay. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 06:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC)