AVID:Requests for Comment/Notability guidelines
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Notability guidelines
I think we should introduce proper notability guidelines. I have come up with a rough draft below; feel free to contribute to this:
A company must fulfill one of the following:
- Must have one of their films screened in a festival/theater. For youtube exclusives then they should follow the youtube notability guidelines
- Must have an official distributor
- Must have one of their series aired on television or a paid service; for free web series such as youtube exclusives then they should follow the youtube notability guidelines
- Must have a physical release
- Must have news coverage (of its film/company/logo)
- Must have been nominated for or won at least one award
- Must have funding from sponsorship/government funded
Solar also proposed the youtube notability guidelines' subscriber minimum to be 500k instead of 1 million and tbh I agree. Less restricting but still strict enough so the average youtube user wouldn't probably be included. - Previously unsigned comment by Logoarto
Support
Support I guess we could. Gilby1385 (talk) 16:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)- Support as I already backed this on the server. Compooper (talk) 16:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support
· Talk · Edits 18:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC) - Support Only making the wiki a step better.
(lets play football) 20:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC) - Support Yuuko2K (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ForcedExcess26 (talk) 20:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support EsaïeGregoryPrickett (talk) 6:23, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support
(TALK•CONTRIBUTIONS) 04:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose This isn't about notability. It's about documenting logos. And obscure companies are just as much of a company as the Big 5. They don't need external funding. They don't need awards. All they need is a film and a logo. Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 09:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
