AVID:Requests for Comment/Please merge with TV Tropes, and speaking of which, Make laconics for logos: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive top|Closing as {{rejected|failed}}: irrelevant and out of our league. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 16:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
==Laconics and Tropes for AVID!== |
==Laconics and Tropes for AVID!== |
||
I want to merge AVID With TV Tropes, as well as give the logos laconics. A example for IMAX's 3rd logo: The film transitions from a traditional film backdrop to a blue CGI space environment, featuring a countdown, IMAX logo, and a blue screen with rotating rings. |
I want to merge AVID With TV Tropes, as well as give the logos laconics. A example for IMAX's 3rd logo: The film transitions from a traditional film backdrop to a blue CGI space environment, featuring a countdown, IMAX logo, and a blue screen with rotating rings. |
||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
||
{{Archive bottom}} |
|||
Revision as of 16:56, 23 October 2023
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Laconics and Tropes for AVID!
I want to merge AVID With TV Tropes, as well as give the logos laconics. A example for IMAX's 3rd logo: The film transitions from a traditional film backdrop to a blue CGI space environment, featuring a countdown, IMAX logo, and a blue screen with rotating rings.
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose What? ForcedExcess26 (talk) 16:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)- Oppose As a Troper myself, this is a pretty stupid idea. What do we have to do with TV Tropes? This just confuses me. Dominicmgm (talk) 16:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose As a troper, I gotta say, I really love this joke you made. You're funny. Seriously, though, RFCs are not meant to be taken lightly. And laconic sections on AVID are necessary how, exactly?
· Talk · Edits 16:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Nope. Charlie179(talk) 16:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm out. Your idea is pretty stupid, as Dom pointed out. Hell, since AlmightyKingPrawn knows TV Tropes well (IIRC), I think she'll oppose this too. --AUnnamedDragon 12:55 PM, October 23, 2023 (CET)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
