AVID:Requests for Comment/Redefine and rename the Reason section: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:26, 15 January 2023

The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing with the following conclusions:

Proposal 1: Don't change.
Proposal 2: Don't change. Logohub (talk) 09:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

So, it's only been a day since the Featured Image Nominations page was created, and already, people are misusing the Reason section, putting their image just because "it's iconic" for instance, also leading to some people thinking that it's all about how good it looks, therefore leaving a lot of submissions being incompetent. And for this, I'm having some serious doubt around the page regarding its submissions. (By the way, I don't mean to mock anyone through their submissions. Even then, I apologize. Thanks for understanding.)

Due to this, I have set up this RfC. I think we may need to further clarify and prioritize the section's use, and possibly change its name to fit in the topic. I have a few names at the moment: "Source:", "Origin:" and "Rarity:".

Either way, I hope something will be done about this regardless. Thank you. Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

1) Usage change

1.1) Make it solely about rarity

Support

Abstain

Oppose

Oppose If it was just rarity, we would only have logos like TAT and such on there. And that would be boring. (• USER TALK! •) 22:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose It's not just about rarity! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 20:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose IN THE WORLD. Why only the "rare" ones? (Talk!) 13:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose per everybody else. · Talk · Edits 14:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments

1.2) Don't change (rarity and significance)

Support

Support (• USER TALK! •) 22:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

2) Name change

2.1) Source:

Support

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

2.2) Origin:

Support

Support maybe? 20thcenturyfox1981 (talk) 00:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

2.3) Rarity:

Support

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

2.4) Don't change (Reason:)

Support

Support I personally think people need to learn how to use the section properly rather than rename it Luke2505 (talk) 00:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Archive top|Closing with the following conclusions:
+*Proposal 1: '''Don't change'''.
+*Proposal 2: '''Don't change'''. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 09:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)}}
 So, it's only been a day since the [[AVID:Featured Image Nominations|Featured Image Nominations]] page was created, and already, people are misusing the Reason section, putting their image just because "[[AVID:Featured Image Nominations#disney logo 2006|it's iconic]]" for instance, also leading to some people thinking that [[AVID:Featured Image Nominations#rede globo 2000 logo|it's all about how good it looks]], therefore leaving a lot of submissions being incompetent. And for this, I'm having some serious doubt around the page regarding its submissions. (By the way, I don't mean to mock anyone through their submissions. Even then, I apologize. Thanks for understanding.)
@@ Line 55: / Line 58: @@
 ====Oppose====
 ====Comments====
+{{Archive bottom}}
 [[Category:Requests for Comment]]