AVID:Requests for Comment/Remove the "No unspecific technique descriptions" rule: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|submit=Yes |
|submit=Yes |
||
|staffreason1={{Approved}} [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 04:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC) |
|staffreason1={{Approved}} [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 04:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC) |
||
|staffreason2={{Approved}} [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 05:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
==Remove the "No unspecific technique descriptions" rule== |
==Remove the "No unspecific technique descriptions" rule== |
Revision as of 05:17, 31 August 2024
This proposal was submitted for staff review. If a week has passed and this proposal is still not reviewed, please notify site staff. Please do not vote on the RFC yet. If one or two staff members abstain or decline the draft, the publisher can continue working on it to address the issues raised. To add reasoning, use the following parameters "staffreason1" or "staffreason2" Staff member 1: Approved Camenati (talk) 04:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC) Staff member 2: Approved · Talk · Edits 05:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC) Last edited by Trevor807 (talk | contribs) 49 days ago. (Update) |
Remove the "No unspecific technique descriptions" rule
So, there are a lot of simple technique descriptions like "2D animation", "CGI", etc. However, the tutorial guide says it prohibits these descriptions. I think this rule should be removed. There are a few reasons why I am requesting this: 1. The staff team considers these descriptions valid, making this rule pointless. 2. It makes editing the technique harder. Unfortunately, if such simple descriptions are the best you can come up with for the technique, they should be allowed to make things easier. 3. The technique does not always have to be too specific; sometimes, it's better to keep it simple. Overall, for these reasons, I don't find this rule useful. What do you think? (Talk to me!) 04:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)