AVID:Requests for Comment/Remove the "No unspecific technique descriptions" rule

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 18:07, 1 September 2024 by Compooper (talk | contribs) (Whoops! Accidentally put in my other account.)

Remove the "No unspecific technique descriptions" rule

So, there are a lot of simple technique descriptions like "2D animation", "CGI", etc. However, the tutorial guide says it prohibits these descriptions. I think this rule should be removed. There are a few reasons why I am requesting this: 1. The staff team considers these descriptions valid, making this rule pointless. 2. It makes editing the technique harder. Unfortunately, if such simple descriptions are the best you can come up with for the technique, they should be allowed to make things easier. 3. The technique does not always have to be too specific; sometimes, it's better to keep it simple. Overall, for these reasons, I don't find this rule useful. What do you think? (Talk to me!) 04:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support We need more consistency in all fronts. Compooper (talk) 18:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Abstain

  1.  Abstain While you do have a point, I still feel like technique expansions are justified in some cases, such as the "2D animation" example which can refer to either cel or computer animation. Gilby1385 (talk) 15:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.